Florida judge blocks Republican-backed voting law as discriminatory
Send a link to a friend
[April 01, 2022]
By Joseph Ax
(Reuters) -A federal judge in Florida on
Thursday invalidated several of the state's new Republican-backed voting
restrictions, ruling that they violate minority voters' constitutional
rights.
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker in Tallahassee blocked the state from
enforcing provisions aimed at reducing the use of drop boxes for
ballots, making it more difficult for third-party organizations to
collect voter registration forms, and banning groups from offering food,
water and other aid to people waiting in line to vote.
Governor Ron DeSantis, who is running for reelection and is also
considered a top Republican contender for the 2024 presidential
election, signed the bill into law last year.
The legislation is among several sweeping voting restrictions passed by
Republican-controlled states following Republican former President
Donald Trump's baseless claims that the 2020 election was stolen from
him.
In a 288-page opinion that followed a trial early this year, Walker said
the legislation, known as Senate Bill 90, built upon two decades of
discriminatory voting laws from the Florida legislature aimed at
strengthening Republican power.
"For the past 20 years, the majority in the Florida Legislature has
attacked the voting rights of its Black constituents," Walker wrote.
In response, state Senate President Wilton Simpson called the ruling
"highly unprofessional, inaccurate and unbecoming of an officer of the
court."
The Republican speaker of the state House of Representatives, Chris
Sprowls, criticized Walker for making "unsupported inferences" and
characterized the opinion as "a predetermined outcome in search of an
overlong and poorly reasoned rationale."
[to top of second column]
|
Poll worker stands next to a ballot collection van during drive-thru
voting on Election Day in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., November
3, 2020. REUTERS/Marco Bello/File Photo
A spokesperson for DeSantis did not
immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling is likely to be appealed to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals, which is widely seen as a more conservative court.
Walker was appointed to the bench by Democratic then-President
Barack Obama.
Walker also criticized the U.S. Supreme Court for its 2013 decision
weakening the Voting Rights Act (VRA), the federal civil rights
legislation that protects minority voters from discrimination. That
ruling struck down a key provision, known as preclearance, that
required certain states with a history of racial discrimination to
get federal approval to change voting laws.
As part of his decision, Walker said he would require preclearance
for the next 10 years for any new law governing third-party voter
registration groups, drop boxes or aid to voters waiting in line.
"This Court recognizes that the right to vote, and the VRA
particularly, are under siege," Walker wrote.
The decision resolved four separate lawsuits filed by numerous civil
rights and voting rights groups. Marc Elias, a Democratic lawyer who
specializes in election cases, led the chief case, while the
national Republican Party intervened as a third party.
(Reporting by Joseph Ax; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Mark Porter)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|