| 
				U.S. District Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco agreed with 
				Musk and Tesla that the proposed temporary restraining order 
				appeared overbroad because it prevented Musk from speaking to 
				"anyone" about the case.
 Chen also found no proof that letting Musk, the world's richest 
				person according to Forbes, talk publicly posed a "clear and 
				present danger" or "serious and imminent threat" to a trial.
 
 But the judge also said he plans to tell jurors at the scheduled 
				January 2023 trial he had already ruled that Musk's tweets were 
				false, and made with sufficient knowledge they were false.
 
 Shareholders sued over losses resulting from volatility in 
				Tesla's shares after Musk tweeted on Aug. 7, 2018, that he had 
				"funding secured" to potentially take Tesla private at $420 per 
				share, and that "investor support is confirmed."
 
 Nicholas Porritt, a lawyer for the shareholders, in an email 
				said he was pleased that jurors will be instructed that the 
				tweets "were false and were made fraudulently by Elon Musk." He 
				said the primary remaining issue is the amount of damages owed.
 
 Lawyers for Musk and Tesla did not immediately respond to 
				requests for comment.
 
 The April 15 request for a gag order came one day after Musk 
				told the TED conference in Vancouver that he had lined up 
				funding to privatize Tesla, but the U.S. Securities and Exchange 
				Commission sued him for fraud anyway over his tweeting.
 
 Musk and Tesla said the proposed gag order "evokes a level of 
				censorship" that could not be reconciled with the U.S. 
				Constitution's guarantee of free speech.
 
 They also said an order could block Musk from communicating with 
				Tesla shareholders, discussing his proposal to buy Twitter Inc, 
				and trying to end his consent decree with the SEC, which 
				requires Tesla lawyers to vet some of his tweets.
 
 Musk has said he would never lie to shareholders. He has offered 
				to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share.
 
 The case is In re Tesla Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District 
				Court, Northern District of California, No. 18-04865.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting 
				by Hyunjoo Jin in San Francisco; Editing by Will Dunham, Bernard 
				Orr)
 
 
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 
				 
				  |  |