|
 Two of Sarah Sachen’s four
children have learning disabilities. When union bosses closed schools in early
2021 and early 2022 to strike over in-person teaching plans, Sachen’s children
suffered.
“My middle two, in sixth and third grade, are on Individualized Education Plans,
and are still over a year behind due to the school closures. Remote learning is
dreadful for children with special needs. It’s so difficult to catch them up,”
Sachen said. “They went back two whole weeks, and then they were sent home due
to the strike. It is so cruel. The strike just disrupts everything because
you’re ripping schedules out from children who are used to a defined structure.”
But the Chicago Teachers Union isn’t content with the power they already possess
over Sachen’s children. They are pushing an amendment to the Illinois
Constitution to expand their ability to bargain and strike over a much wider
range of topics, including its social agenda on housing, immigration,
“restorative justice,” wealth redistribution and defunding the police.
 Sachen sees the threat to her children in the proposal dubbed Amendment 1. She,
another Chicago Public Schools parent and two teachers filed a petition in state
court asking that the Illinois State Board of Elections remove the question from
the ballot because it oversteps national labor relations law and is therefore
unconstitutional.
They are represented by the Liberty Justice Center, a national nonprofit law
firm, and the Illinois Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research organization.
Unions pushed for the amendment, calling it the “Workers’ Rights Amendment,” and
got the Illinois General Assembly in 2021 to put it on the Nov. 8 general
election ballot.
Amendment 1 claims to give any employee – from either private businesses or
government – a “fundamental right” to engage in collective bargaining for
various reasons. But the National Labor Relations Act governs private-sector
collective bargaining nationwide – and preempts state laws that would attempt to
do so. The plaintiffs argue the proposal is unconstitutional and are seeking a
court order directing state leaders to keep it off the ballot.
Of particular concern to the plaintiffs is that the NLRA limits the subjects of
mandatory collective bargaining to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions
of employment. In the past 10 years, CTU has walked out five times over
affordable housing, mental health and other bargaining terms that were not wages
and hours.
“Amendment 1 violates the U.S. Constitution and must be taken off the ballot.
Federal law protects and regulates collective bargaining in the private sector,”
said Jacob Huebert, president of the Liberty Justice Center. “This attempt to
create a state-law right to private-sector collective bargaining on top of that
violates federal law and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The
Illinois Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that unconstitutional proposals
cannot go before the voters, so the courts should order state officials to
remove Amendment 1 from the ballot.”
[to top of second column] |
The change would cement teacher strikes into the
constitution in a state that has already seen 48 school disruptions
in 10 years. If passed, the amendment would prohibit lawmakers from
ever limiting what unions could demand or when they could strike.
None of the states bordering Illinois even allow teachers to strike.
“I am signing on as a plaintiff because my family has been so
negatively impacted by teachers’ strikes and work refusals,” Sachen
said. “Amendment 1 poses a danger to my family; more CTU strikes
would mean a deeper learning loss for my children and further
burdens for me.”
Amendment 1 poses a threat to all Illinoisans.
It would make permanent or worsen skyrocketing pension debt, leading
to continued tax increases to pay for benefits to the few at the
expense of many taxpayers. It would also make rooting out corruption
and bad actors even more difficult as laws set in place to reduce
corruption could be overruled by collective bargaining agreements.
The amendment would preempt laws put in place to protect children
and families, potentially leading to more unnecessary harm to the
state’s most vulnerable and making reform virtually impossible.
Lawmakers and voters would always be overruled by union demands.
Mailee Smith, director of labor policy and staff attorney for the
Illinois Policy Institute, said, “The language as written in
Amendment 1 is too broad. If Illinois were seeking solely to make
right-to-work unconstitutional in Illinois, the phrasing would have
reflected that, as it did in a previous version of this amendment
filed in 2019. Instead, the current phrasing creates a litany of
problems, could lead to unparalleled power by a special interest
group and most importantly, is unconstitutional.”
Ultimately, union bosses who don’t answer to voters would control
state income taxes and local property taxes through the power to
negotiate and strike over anything they wish. Taxpayers and their
elected representatives would be relatively powerless to pull back
on the powers of a special interest group whose “rights” have
constitutional protection in a state where union contracts can
already overpower state law.
The lawsuit was filed April 21, 2022, in the Seventh Judicial
Circuit Court in Sangamon County.
|
