| The 
				complaint against MoneyGram, one of the largest U.S. providers 
				of remittance transfers, was filed in Manhattan federal court by 
				the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and New York 
				Attorney General Letitia James.
 Remittance transfers let people in the United States send money 
				electronically to people in other countries, and exceed $100 
				billion annually.
 
 MoneyGram was accused of having repeatedly "stranded" recipients 
				waiting for their money, given senders inaccurate information 
				about when transfers would be completed and failed to address 
				customer complaints in accordance with the 2013 rule.
 
 Problems persist despite a series of software and technology 
				updates, with some transactions still getting "stuck" in 
				MoneyGram's systems, the complaint said.
 
 "MoneyGram spent years failing its customers and failing to 
				follow the law, ignoring customer complaints and government 
				warnings in the process," CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a 
				statement. "MoneyGram's long pattern of misconduct must be 
				halted."
 
 In a statement, Dallas-based MoneyGram said it plans to defend 
				against the "frivolous" lawsuit, and that its compliance program 
				was effective and consumers suffered no harm.
 
 "The CFPB and its director entered into discussions with closed 
				minds and unfortunately chose to make increasingly unjustifiable 
				and unprecedented demands," the company said. "Ultimately, 
				MoneyGram refused to be strong-armed into an unfair settlement."
 
 MoneyGram agreed in February to be acquired by private equity 
				firm Madison Dearborn Partners in a $1.8 billion transaction.
 
 In afternoon trading, MoneyGram shares were down 49 cents, or 
				4.6%, at $10.16, after earlier falling to $9.76.
 
 Thursday's lawsuit seeks unspecified refunds, restitution and 
				civil damages. It is the CFPB's fifth remittance-related case 
				since 2019.
 
 "We will be looking to seek a broader set of remedies to halt 
				repeated law-breaking and disregard for the rule of law," Chopra 
				told reporters. "I am committed to stamping out misconduct by 
				firms that break the law over and over again."
 
 The case is Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v 
				MoneyGram International Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern 
				District of New York, No. 22-03256.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Katanga Johnson 
				in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Paul Simao and Andrea Ricci)
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 
				 
				  |  |