| 
		Florida set to strip Disney of self-governing status in dispute over 
		LGBTQ law
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 22, 2022] 
		By Maria Caspani and Dawn Chmielewski 
 (Reuters) -Florida lawmakers on Thursday 
		gave their final approval to a bill ending Walt Disney Co's designation 
		as a self-governing entity in an apparent response to its opposition to 
		a new state law limiting the teaching of LGBTQ issues in schools.
 
 Losing the designation may represent a big blow to Disney's sprawling 
		Orlando theme parks, which for over half a century have managed to 
		operate with a high degree of autonomy, with the freedom to control 
		everything from road maintenance to building projects.
 
 Even so, experts say the financial impact of the legislation on the 
		company and the state is still unclear.
 
 Governor Ron DeSantis, a potential 2024 Republican presidential nominee 
		who fiercely backs the ban on classroom instruction on sexual 
		orientation and gender identity for children under age 9, is expected to 
		sign the bill into law.
 
 The bill would effectively strip Disney of a status that allowed the 
		company to self-govern an area of roughly 25,000-acres in Central 
		Florida where Walt Disney World resort is located.
 
 The area called the Reedy Creek Improvement District https://www.rcid.org 
		encompasses four Disney theme parks, two water parks and 175 miles of 
		roadway, and functions like a county government, providing services such 
		as fire-fighting, power, water and roads within the Orange and Osceola 
		counties.
 
		
		 
		Disney, whose Florida resort is known the world over for its pristine 
		streets, colorful rides and family-friendly image, in turn gets relief 
		from taxes and fees.
 The special status also allows the district to issue bonds with tax 
		advantages to pay for improvements and for Disney to avoid the process 
		of obtaining building permits for some projects.
 
 The Florida Parental Rights in Education legislation is one of a series 
		of moves by Republican-controlled states to enact new restrictions on 
		public education in the run-up to the midterm elections later this year.
 
 Supporters say such measures give parents more control over their 
		children's education, but opponents say they mostly unfairly infringe 
		the rights of transgender and other marginalized students.
 
 Disney initially failed to publicly oppose the legislation, prompting 
		criticism last month by many in the LGBTQ community and some employees. 
		Later Disney condemned the law and said it would suspend political 
		donations in Florida pending a review.
 
 In a surprise move, DeSantis asked the legislature to consider the bill 
		to strip Disney of its status during a special session he called this 
		week. It was filed and passed within just three days. The change would 
		go into effect in June 2023.
 
 "By trying to bring California values to Florida, Floridians have said, 
		'All right, you're a guest in our state. Maybe you don't deserve special 
		privileges anymore,'" state Representative Randy Fine, a Republican who 
		is lead sponsor of the bill, told CNBC.
 
 On Thursday, the Florida House of Representatives voted 70-38 to do away 
		with the special tax district created by a 1967 law that allows Disney 
		to self-govern the Orlando area. On Wednesday, the state Senate approved 
		the measure by a 23-16 vote.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Security officers staff the entrance at the Walt Disney World's 
			Magic Kingdom in Orlando, Florida, U.S. June 13, 2016. 
			REUTERS/Barbara Liston//File Photo 
            
			 DeSantis, an ally of former 
			President Donald Trump who has also courted conservative voters on 
			issues such as immigration and abortion, did not immediately comment 
			on the bill's passage, nor did Disney. 
 WHOM WILL IT HARM MOST?
 
 Disney is historically a major political contributor in the state. 
			In the 2020 election cycle, the company donated $4.8 million in 
			total, including campaign funds to more than 100 individual Florida 
			legislative members, some of whom sponsored Thursday’s legislation, 
			state records show.
 
 The company also gave more than $900,000 to the state Republican 
			party and more than $550,000 to the Republican senatorial campaign 
			committee, along with $300,000 to the state Democratic party and 
			$50,000 to DeSantis.
 
 But its opposition to the new law, dubbed "don't say gay" by 
			opponents, set off a storm of condemnation against the company by 
			many Republicans. It takes effect on July 1 and also prohibits such 
			teaching that "is not age appropriate or developmentally 
			appropriate" for older students. It is being challenged in court.
 
 It is unclear if the state or the company will be harmed most by 
			Thursday's move, as Disney is a major local employer and contributor 
			to the state's coffers, with around 70,000 staff.
 
 The Walt Disney Resort paid $780.3 million in state and local taxes 
			in 2021, according to a fact sheet commemorating the 50th 
			anniversary of the theme park.
 
 Orange County Tax Collector Scott Randolph said that legislation 
			will punish local taxpayers more than Disney.
 
 "Yes, Disney pays a lot in taxes, but when you add up the numbers, 
			it pushes a lot of the tax burden onto local taxpayers," he said of 
			the bill.
 
 Disney already received many of the benefits from the special 
			district in getting the park built and could come out ahead 
			financially by shifting the cost of maintenance and services to the 
			local jurisdictions, said David Ramba, executive director of the 
			Florida Association of Special Districts.
 
			
			 "They get to control the level of service versus leaving it to a 
			county government," Ramba said. 
 (Reporting by Maria Caspani in New York, Dawn Chmielewski in Los 
			Angeles, Joseph Ax in Princeton, N.J., Rich McKay and Dan Trotta in 
			Carlsbad, Calif.Writing by Costas PitasEditing by Leslie Adler, 
			Matthew Lewis and Bernard Orr)
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.]  This 
			material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or 
			redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |