| 
		Iron man Elon Musk places his Tesla battery bets
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 27, 2022]  By 
		Hyunjoo Jin and Paul Lienert 
 (Reuters) - As Tesla's profits and prices 
		grabbed headlines last week, a potentially pivotal development for the 
		global car industry flew largely under the radar.
 
 The U.S. electric pioneer disclosed that nearly half of the vehicles it 
		produced in the first quarter were equipped with lithium iron phosphate 
		(LFP) batteries - a cheaper rival to the nickel-and-cobalt based cells 
		that dominate in the West.
 
 The revelation, eclipsed by the carmaker's $19 billion revenue and Elon 
		Musk's Twitter charge, was the first time Tesla had disclosed such 
		specifics about its batteries make-up.
 
 It flashed a strong signal that iron-based cells are finally starting to 
		win global appeal at a time when nickel is blighted by supply concerns 
		due to major producer Russia's war in Ukraine and cobalt is tainted by 
		reports of dangerous conditions at artisanal mines in Democratic 
		Republic of Congo.
 
 Tesla is not alone in betting that LFP batteries, already popular in 
		China, can make inroads into Western markets.
 
		
		 
		More than a dozen companies are considering establishing factories for 
		LFP batteries and components in the United States and Europe over the 
		next three years, according to a Reuters review of the electric vehicle 
		(EV) scene and interviews with several players.
 See accompanying factbox on the plans:
 
 "I think lithium iron phosphate has a new life," said Mujeeb Ijaz, 
		founder of U.S. battery startup Our Next Energy which says it is 
		scouting a U.S. production site. "It has a clear and long-term advantage 
		for the electric vehicle industry."
 
 Ijaz has worked in the field long enough to see a technology that failed 
		to catch on in America a decade ago gather fresh momentum. He was chief 
		technology officer at Michigan-based A123, an early producer of LFP 
		batteries that went bankrupt in 2012 and was acquired by a Chinese 
		company.
 
 He and other LFP advocates cited the relative abundance and cheaper 
		prices of iron as a key factor beginning to outweigh the drawbacks that 
		have held back the adoption of LFP cells globally - they are bigger and 
		heavier, and generally hold less energy than NCM cells, giving them a 
		shorter range.
 
 There is a mountain to climb, though.
 
 LFP chemistry has accounted for just 3% of EV batteries in the United 
		States and Canada in 2022 and 6% in the European Union, with 
		nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) cells accounting for the rest, according 
		to data from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI).
 
 The race is far tighter in China, where LFP commands 44% of the EV 
		market versus NCM's 56%.
 
 It could be long and tough road for Western LFP cell manufacturers 
		seeking to prosper against rivals from China, which accounts for about 
		90% of global production.
 
 A shorter-term concern for such companies, according to BMI's chief data 
		officer Caspar Rawles, is a continued dependence on Chinese suppliers 
		for refined materials.
 
 LFP cells also contain more lithium than NCM rivals, and industry 
		experts raise concerns that iron-based batteries' historic advantage of 
		being cheaper to produce could be eroded and even erased by rising costs 
		of the metal.
 
 NEVER LEAVE LOS ANGELES?
 
 Tesla has been using LFP in some entry-level, U.S.-made versions of its 
		Model 3 since last year, expanding their use of the technology beyond 
		China, where about two years ago it started using LFP batteries made by 
		Chinese firm CATL, the world's largest EV battery maker, for some Model 
		3s.
 
 Yet given the historic dominance of nickel-and-cobalt based batteries in 
		the United States, the scale of Tesla's usage of LFP cells in the first 
		quarter of 2022 - fitted in roughly 150,000 cars produced - took some 
		analysts and battery specialists by surprise.
 
 Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
 
 Mitra Chem, co-founded by former Tesla battery supply chain manager 
		Vivas Kumar, is working to build LFP battery materials, initially in 
		California. He said he expected nickel prices would remain volatile 
		because of supply chain dislocations.
 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			Two Aries lithium iron phosphate battery packs are seen waiting to 
			undergo testing at Our Next Energy headquarters in Novi, Michigan, 
			U.S., April 25, 2022. REUTERS/ Rebecca Cook 
            
			 
"The best insurance policy that automakers have ... is to incorporate more 
iron-based cathodes in their portfolio," he added.
 U.S. electric vehicle startup Fisker, which plans to use LFP batteries in its 
lower-range SUVs, plans to initially source cells from CATL. But CEO Henrik 
Fisker said that it was in talks with battery suppliers to source batteries made 
in the United States, Canada or Mexico from 2024 or 2025.
 
 Local sourcing is important because it is expensive to ship the heavy packs from 
Asia, especially for low-cost, high-volume vehicles, according to Fisker. It is 
also not environmentally friendly, added the CEO, who is confident there will be 
a major place for LFP batteries in the global EV mix.
 
 "(If) I never leave Los Angeles, I never leave San Francisco, I never leave 
London ... I think that's where LFP comes in really well," he said of 
urban-dwelling EV owners who drive shorter distances.
 
 Other premium carmakers are also looking at the chemistry following the outbreak 
of the Ukraine war, including Volkswagen's Audi, which hasn't used LFP batteries 
before.
 
 "It may well be that we will see LFP in a larger portion of the fleet in the 
medium term," Audi CEO Markus Duesmann said in March. "After the war, a new 
situation will emerge; we will adapt to that and choose battery technologies and 
specifications accordingly."
 
 BMW's chief procurement officer Joachim Post also said recently that the company 
was examining the merits of LFP. "We're looking at different technologies to 
minimize the use of resources and also we're looking at optimizing chemistry," 
he added.
 
 DISCIPLINED, NO SCREW-UPS
 
 Among their advantages, LFP cells tend to pose less of a fire risk than NCM 
cells, and can be fully charged continually without losing as much performance 
over the life of the battery.
 
 
As the global EV market expands, the chemistry is expected to find its way into 
more entry-level consumer and commercial vehicles where longer range is not as 
critical.
 Yet the hurdles to widespread LFP cell adoption include finding solutions to 
improve energy density - thus reducing the size and weight - and grappling with 
the rising cost of lithium.
 
 Here's a graphic: https://tmsnrt.rs/3uUejfn
 
 Meanwhile, building out and scaling up LFP production in the United States and 
Europe will take time, underscoring the challenge to Western governments in 
reducing reliance on China.
 
 American startups face an uphill battle of scaling up to compete with CATL 
(Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd), which is backed by Chinese government 
subsidies and supplies Tesla, among others, with LFP cells.
 
 
"Everything has to be disciplined manufacturing, without any screw-ups," said 
Bob Galyen, a former chief technology officer at CATL who now runs a batteries 
consultancy, Galyen Energy. 
 He also noted: "A U.S.-based company does not have to worry about the 
geopolitical issues that China and U.S. have presently."
 
 (Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in San Francisco and Paul Lienert in Detroit; 
Additional reporting by Christina Amann and Victoria Waldersee in Berlin; 
Editing by Pravin Char)
 
				 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |