| 
		U.S. Supreme Court hears Oklahoma tribal dispute in Breyer's last case
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 27, 2022] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme 
		Court on Wednesday, in Justice Stephen Breyer's last scheduled oral 
		argument before retirement, is set to consider limiting the scope of its 
		own 2020 ruling that greatly expanded Native American tribal authority 
		in Oklahoma.
 
 The justices are hearing the state's appeal in a case involving Victor 
		Castro-Huerta, a non-Native American convicted of child neglect in a 
		crime was committed against a Native American child - his 5-year-old 
		stepdaughter - on the Cherokee Nation reservation.
 
 A state court threw out Castro-Huerta's conviction, saying the Supreme 
		Court's 2020 ruling deprived Oklahoma authorities of jurisdiction in his 
		case.
 
 Breyer, at 83 the oldest of the nine justices, announced his retirement 
		in January, effective at the end of the court's current term. The 
		Oklahoma case is the last one on the argument calendar, with the 
		justices expected to finish issuing rulings for the term by the end of 
		June. The Senate on April 7 voted to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson, 
		Democratic President Joe Biden's pick as the first Black woman to serve 
		on the court, as Breyer's replacement.
 
 The court's 2020 ruling in a case called McGirt v. Oklahoma recognized 
		about half of Oklahoma - much of the eastern part of the state - as 
		Native American reservation land beyond the jurisdiction of state 
		authorities. The ruling, heavily criticized by Republican Oklahoma 
		officials, meant that many crimes on the land in question involving 
		Native Americans now must be prosecuted in tribal or federal courts.
 
		
		 
		The state continues to prosecute crimes in which no Native Americans are 
		involved in the affected area.
 The Supreme Court in January rejected Oklahoma's request that it 
		overturn the McGirt ruling, which tribes have welcomed as a recognition 
		of their sovereignty.
 
 The new case focuses only on whether non-Native Americans who commit 
		crimes on Native American land against Native Americans should remain 
		under state jurisdiction. As a result of the McGirt ruling, such crimes 
		- about 3,600 every year, according to the state - will now be 
		prosecuted by the federal government.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer holds up a copy of the 
			U.S. Constitution as he announces he will retire at the end of the 
			court's current term, at the White House in Washington, U.S., 
			January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque 
            
			 The ruling will not affect the cases 
			now heard in tribal courts involving crimes committed by and against 
			Native Americans.
 The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in 2021 threw out 
			Castro-Huerta's conviction in state court. Castro-Huerta by then was 
			already indicted for the same underlying offense by federal 
			authorities, transferred from state to federal custody and pleaded 
			guilty to one count of child neglect. He has not yet been sentenced.
 
 In the state court case, Castro-Huerta was convicted of neglecting 
			his stepdaughter, who has cerebral palsy and is legally blind. He 
			was sentenced to 35 years in prison.
 
 Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, a Republican, has been critical of 
			the McGirt decision and supported the effort to overturn it, saying 
			in January that it has "hamstrung law enforcement in half the 
			state."
 
 Tribal leaders say Stitt should be working with them and the federal 
			government to ensure there are necessary resources to handle the 
			increased caseload in tribal and federal courts.
 
 "The governor is plainly not comfortable in a world where tribes are 
			asserting their sovereignty," Chuck Hoskin, principal chief of 
			Cherokee Nation, told Reuters.
 
 "We've heard that story before," Hoskin added, alluding to historic 
			mistreatment of Native Americans.
 
 In the 5-4 McGirt ruling, conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch joined 
			four liberal justices in the majority. Since then, the court has 
			moved rightward, with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett 
			replacing the late liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020, 
			leaving a 6-3 conservative majority.
 
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.]  This 
			material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or 
			redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			 |