| 
		Twitter deal could bolster lawsuit over Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 29, 2022]  By 
		Tom Hals 
 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's $44 billion 
		takeover of Twitter is helping provide ammunition for an upcoming trial 
		where an investor will argue the CEO's $56 billion pay package from 
		Tesla Inc is a waste of money that failed to secure his full-time 
		services.
 
 The deal for Twitter Inc and its potential to distract Musk from Tesla 
		will play an important part of the trial in October, according to one of 
		the shareholder's attorneys.
 
 The lawsuit alleges Musk created the 10-year package and Tesla's board 
		rubber-stamped it in 2018 without requiring the celebrity CEO devote 
		himself to the electric vehicle maker.
 
 "Look at most CEO contracts. The first line, it says 'you're going to be 
		a full-time CEO and devote substantially full time to the business and 
		affairs of the company.' That's standard," said Greg Varallo of 
		Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, the firm that is leading the case 
		against the pay deal.
 
 Musk and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. In court papers, 
		the defendants said the plan was properly crafted by independent 
		directors, approved by stockholders and has generated unprecedented 
		gains for investors.
 
		
		 
		Tesla's stock has fallen more than 20% since Musk disclosed he had taken 
		a 9% stake in Twitter on April 4, partly on concerns he was distracted 
		from the electric vehicle maker's supply chain problems. 
 In addition to Twitter, the multitasking entrepreneur is already 
		chairman of rocket company SpaceX, founder of tunneling venture The 
		Boring Company and owns Neuralink, a brain-chip startup. His stated 
		ambitions include colonizing Mars.
 
 The 2018 Tesla pay package grants stock options as the company meets 
		escalating financial goals, which the company said would incentivize his 
		continued leadership. If Tesla met all targets, described as "stretch" 
		goals, the plan would be worth a minimum $56 billion, although as 
		Tesla's stock rises so does the plan's value.
 
 Curently, Musk's stock vested under the plan is worth around $75 
		billion, according to Amit Batish of research firm Equilar. He estimated 
		that is about 35 times the combined value of the 100 highest CEO pay 
		packages from 2021.
 
 The lawsuit in Delaware's Court of Chancery by shareholder Richard 
		Tornetta alleges the package was unnecessary, since Musk at the time 
		owned 22% of Tesla, giving him plenty of incentive to make the company a 
		success.
 
		
		 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			SpaceX owner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk at the E3 gaming convention in 
			Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 13, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake 
            
			 
Tornetta seeks to cancel the plan, including stock options already granted. 
 Musk is using his Tesla stock as collateral for loans to buy Twitter.
 
 Musk and Tesla's directors argued in court filings that the pay package did what 
it set out to do -- align Musk's incentives with shareholders and create value.
 
 "Since it was implemented, Tesla’s value has increased by more than 1,800% from 
about $53 billion to over $1 trillion," the filing said. They noted that despite 
the enormous growth in value, Musk has not reached all the milestones.
 
 Shareholders in March 2018 approved the package, which in securities filings 
were called "challenging."
 
 The lawsuit said shareholders should have been informed before the vote that 
management knew some milestones were likely to be achieved, which was described 
as a materially misleading omission.
 
 Tesla countered in court papers that the internal projections were "stretch" 
targets.
 
 "Nothing that Elon touches or does is not bold and super stretched and 
aggressive,” Tesla’s former chief financial officer, Deepak Ahuja, testified in 
a deposition in the case, according to a court filing.
 
 Despite the outlandish size of the pay, the trial will likely turn on the 
thinking of directors in negotiating the package and what the board told 
shareholders before the vote.
 
 
 
"No one could have looked in the crystal ball and seen the Twitter situation," 
said Minor Myers, a professor at University of Connecticut School of Law. "But 
they could have negotiated for some measure of Musk’s time at Tesla."
 
 The trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 24 in Wilmington, Delaware and last five 
days.
 
 (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder and 
Lisa Shumaker)
 
				 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |