Twitter deal could bolster lawsuit over Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay
Send a link to a friend
[April 29, 2022] By
Tom Hals
(Reuters) - Elon Musk's $44 billion
takeover of Twitter is helping provide ammunition for an upcoming trial
where an investor will argue the CEO's $56 billion pay package from
Tesla Inc is a waste of money that failed to secure his full-time
services.
The deal for Twitter Inc and its potential to distract Musk from Tesla
will play an important part of the trial in October, according to one of
the shareholder's attorneys.
The lawsuit alleges Musk created the 10-year package and Tesla's board
rubber-stamped it in 2018 without requiring the celebrity CEO devote
himself to the electric vehicle maker.
"Look at most CEO contracts. The first line, it says 'you're going to be
a full-time CEO and devote substantially full time to the business and
affairs of the company.' That's standard," said Greg Varallo of
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, the firm that is leading the case
against the pay deal.
Musk and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. In court papers,
the defendants said the plan was properly crafted by independent
directors, approved by stockholders and has generated unprecedented
gains for investors.
Tesla's stock has fallen more than 20% since Musk disclosed he had taken
a 9% stake in Twitter on April 4, partly on concerns he was distracted
from the electric vehicle maker's supply chain problems.
In addition to Twitter, the multitasking entrepreneur is already
chairman of rocket company SpaceX, founder of tunneling venture The
Boring Company and owns Neuralink, a brain-chip startup. His stated
ambitions include colonizing Mars.
The 2018 Tesla pay package grants stock options as the company meets
escalating financial goals, which the company said would incentivize his
continued leadership. If Tesla met all targets, described as "stretch"
goals, the plan would be worth a minimum $56 billion, although as
Tesla's stock rises so does the plan's value.
Curently, Musk's stock vested under the plan is worth around $75
billion, according to Amit Batish of research firm Equilar. He estimated
that is about 35 times the combined value of the 100 highest CEO pay
packages from 2021.
The lawsuit in Delaware's Court of Chancery by shareholder Richard
Tornetta alleges the package was unnecessary, since Musk at the time
owned 22% of Tesla, giving him plenty of incentive to make the company a
success.
[to top of second column] |
SpaceX owner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk at the E3 gaming convention in
Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 13, 2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Tornetta seeks to cancel the plan, including stock options already granted.
Musk is using his Tesla stock as collateral for loans to buy Twitter.
Musk and Tesla's directors argued in court filings that the pay package did what
it set out to do -- align Musk's incentives with shareholders and create value.
"Since it was implemented, Tesla’s value has increased by more than 1,800% from
about $53 billion to over $1 trillion," the filing said. They noted that despite
the enormous growth in value, Musk has not reached all the milestones.
Shareholders in March 2018 approved the package, which in securities filings
were called "challenging."
The lawsuit said shareholders should have been informed before the vote that
management knew some milestones were likely to be achieved, which was described
as a materially misleading omission.
Tesla countered in court papers that the internal projections were "stretch"
targets.
"Nothing that Elon touches or does is not bold and super stretched and
aggressive,” Tesla’s former chief financial officer, Deepak Ahuja, testified in
a deposition in the case, according to a court filing.
Despite the outlandish size of the pay, the trial will likely turn on the
thinking of directors in negotiating the package and what the board told
shareholders before the vote.
"No one could have looked in the crystal ball and seen the Twitter situation,"
said Minor Myers, a professor at University of Connecticut School of Law. "But
they could have negotiated for some measure of Musk’s time at Tesla."
The trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 24 in Wilmington, Delaware and last five
days.
(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder and
Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |