| 
		How infant formula makers are saturating mothers' social media
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 29, 2022] 
		By Richa Naidu 
 LONDON (Reuters) - Stephanie Labarta, 31, 
		was six months pregnant when she first noticed the occasional infant 
		formula ad on Instagram and Facebook. Now, a year later, she sees ads 
		three or four times a day, typically for Reckitt Benckiser's Enfamil or 
		Nestle's Gerber Good Start.
 
 “Gerber actually came up this morning on my feed - it started off with a 
		contest to submit your smiling baby and then it trickled into the 
		different types of formulas and what they have available," said Labarta, 
		a senior analyst at a nonprofit in New York.
 
 Soon after the influx of social media ads began, Labarta also received 
		an unexpected care-package from an online registry that included an 
		infant formula sample.
 
		
		 
		Such marketing represents what the World Health Organization describes 
		in a report released Friday as “inappropriate promotion of breast-milk 
		substitutes” via digital media.
 Friday's report builds on WHO research published in February that 
		flagged broader “aggressive” marketing tactics in the industry, which is 
		set to grow to more than $54 billion in formula sales this year, 
		according to Euromonitor.
 
 "Breast-milk substitutes companies buy direct access to pregnant women 
		and mothers in their most vulnerable moments from social media platforms 
		and influencers," WHO researchers said in the report. "They use apps, 
		babyclubs, advice services and online registrations to collect personal 
		information and send personalized breast-milk substitutes promotions to 
		mothers."
 
 In Western countries, what Labarta experienced is “very common 
		practice," Laurence Grummer-Strawn, one of the report's authors, told 
		Reuters. "They're using digital technology to get addresses of these 
		women; (to) identify that they are pregnant; to get them on the lists 
		and such for that kind of distribution."
 
 The WHO, which has closely monitored marketing practices in the industry 
		since the 1970s and created a non-legally binding code of conduct for 
		companies in 1981, recommends exclusive breastfeeding for newborns, 
		where possible, as the healthier option. To be sure, for many parents 
		breastfeeding is not possible and formula is essential.
 
 Companies like Reckitt, Danone and Nestle all encourage parents to 
		breastfeed and have their own strict guidelines detailing what their 
		marketing representatives can or cannot do or say to mothers.
 
 Danone's global head of digital transformation, Mabel Lu, said that 
		while it was true that women are "constantly reached out to by targeted 
		content" online, the problem is largely due to algorithms on social 
		media platforms automatically displaying ads they think are relevant to 
		users.
 
 Reckitt said it provides parents with essential information about the 
		best nutrition for their babies and follows all local regulations on 
		marketing, which are often stricter than the WHO code.
 
 
		
		 
		Nestle, the world's biggest food company, has said that it will stop 
		promoting infant formula for babies younger than six months all over the 
		world from the end of 2022. Currently, Nestle does not promote infant 
		formula for babies younger than 12 months in 163 countries. Some, 
		including Nestle, say they cannot control the actions of independent 
		"bad actors".
 
		[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
		"Anyone in China can buy infant formula in Australia and sell it back on 
		the internet independently," Marie Chantal Messier, global head of food 
		and industry affairs at Nestle, told Reuters. "Often, people are not 
		aware of the WHO code and therefore it's challenging for us to engage."
 "They raise a fair point that there are multiple actors who are involved 
		in this," WHO's Grummer-Strawn said. But it's unfair to "absolve them of 
		responsibility...they pay marketers, they sponsor the various entities 
		that are sharing misinformation," he added.
 
 #FORMULAFORHAPPINESS
 
 For Friday’s report, the WHO analysed data from 4 million social media 
		posts about infant feeding over a six-month period using a commercial 
		social listening platform. The posts reached 2.47 billion people and 
		generated more than 12 million likes, shares or comments. The 264 
		breast-milk substitutes brand accounts monitored for the WHO research 
		posted content around 90 times per day and reached 229 million users.
 
 In the United States alone, the amount the infant formula industry spent 
		on advertising on Reddit, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter nearly doubled 
		to $3.82 million in 2021 versus 2017, according to Nielsen. Companies 
		spent more on using digital marketing to sell infant formula last year 
		than on any other type of advertising, the data showed.
 
 "Where two or three years ago less than 5% of their budgets went into 
		influencer marketing, now that could be anywhere from 25% to 50% of 
		their budget," said Maria Sipka, co-founder of influencer marketing 
		agency Linqia, which has worked on more than 20 campaigns for infant 
		nutrition brands including Nestle's Gerber Good Start #forumlaforhappiness 
		campaign.
 
 Sipka said the true value of an influencer campaign is that it must not 
		"smell like it's a promotion".
 
		
		 
		In a Linqia client brief seen by Reuters, influencer mothers were told 
		by an unnamed food company that its infant formula is the only one that 
		contains "a probiotic clinically shown to reduce crying by up to 50% in 
		colicky breastfed infants" that is "ideal for formula-fed babies."
 Mothers were told to "start your blog story by sharing your excitement 
		and enthusiasm for your partnership" with the brand, share their story 
		about how it provided comfort to their baby, and then ask their 
		followers to share their thoughts about the brand.
 
 "I think it's OK to explain that products are scientific and to show 
		healthcare providers with lab coats, provided that doing so meets your 
		code of conduct and that there is real substance to what is being said, 
		that you can actually prove it through the data," a former Reckitt 
		Benckiser executive said.
 
 Some, however, are more skeptical about the ads, saying their increasing 
		frequency is actively turning mothers away from breastfeeding.
 
 "It's rampant on Instagram and on Facebook, it's everywhere on my 
		stories," New York-based lactation consultant Rebecca Four said. "I've 
		noticed the uptick. Does it anger us? Frustrate us? Of course."
 
 (Reporting by Richa Naidu; Additional reporting by Sheila Dang; Editing 
		by Vanessa O'Connor and Lisa Shumaker)
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]  This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |