How infant formula makers are saturating mothers' social media
Send a link to a friend
[April 29, 2022]
By Richa Naidu
LONDON (Reuters) - Stephanie Labarta, 31,
was six months pregnant when she first noticed the occasional infant
formula ad on Instagram and Facebook. Now, a year later, she sees ads
three or four times a day, typically for Reckitt Benckiser's Enfamil or
Nestle's Gerber Good Start.
“Gerber actually came up this morning on my feed - it started off with a
contest to submit your smiling baby and then it trickled into the
different types of formulas and what they have available," said Labarta,
a senior analyst at a nonprofit in New York.
Soon after the influx of social media ads began, Labarta also received
an unexpected care-package from an online registry that included an
infant formula sample.
Such marketing represents what the World Health Organization describes
in a report released Friday as “inappropriate promotion of breast-milk
substitutes” via digital media.
Friday's report builds on WHO research published in February that
flagged broader “aggressive” marketing tactics in the industry, which is
set to grow to more than $54 billion in formula sales this year,
according to Euromonitor.
"Breast-milk substitutes companies buy direct access to pregnant women
and mothers in their most vulnerable moments from social media platforms
and influencers," WHO researchers said in the report. "They use apps,
babyclubs, advice services and online registrations to collect personal
information and send personalized breast-milk substitutes promotions to
mothers."
In Western countries, what Labarta experienced is “very common
practice," Laurence Grummer-Strawn, one of the report's authors, told
Reuters. "They're using digital technology to get addresses of these
women; (to) identify that they are pregnant; to get them on the lists
and such for that kind of distribution."
The WHO, which has closely monitored marketing practices in the industry
since the 1970s and created a non-legally binding code of conduct for
companies in 1981, recommends exclusive breastfeeding for newborns,
where possible, as the healthier option. To be sure, for many parents
breastfeeding is not possible and formula is essential.
Companies like Reckitt, Danone and Nestle all encourage parents to
breastfeed and have their own strict guidelines detailing what their
marketing representatives can or cannot do or say to mothers.
Danone's global head of digital transformation, Mabel Lu, said that
while it was true that women are "constantly reached out to by targeted
content" online, the problem is largely due to algorithms on social
media platforms automatically displaying ads they think are relevant to
users.
Reckitt said it provides parents with essential information about the
best nutrition for their babies and follows all local regulations on
marketing, which are often stricter than the WHO code.
Nestle, the world's biggest food company, has said that it will stop
promoting infant formula for babies younger than six months all over the
world from the end of 2022. Currently, Nestle does not promote infant
formula for babies younger than 12 months in 163 countries. Some,
including Nestle, say they cannot control the actions of independent
"bad actors".
[to top of second column]
|
"Anyone in China can buy infant formula in Australia and sell it back on
the internet independently," Marie Chantal Messier, global head of food
and industry affairs at Nestle, told Reuters. "Often, people are not
aware of the WHO code and therefore it's challenging for us to engage."
"They raise a fair point that there are multiple actors who are involved
in this," WHO's Grummer-Strawn said. But it's unfair to "absolve them of
responsibility...they pay marketers, they sponsor the various entities
that are sharing misinformation," he added.
#FORMULAFORHAPPINESS
For Friday’s report, the WHO analysed data from 4 million social media
posts about infant feeding over a six-month period using a commercial
social listening platform. The posts reached 2.47 billion people and
generated more than 12 million likes, shares or comments. The 264
breast-milk substitutes brand accounts monitored for the WHO research
posted content around 90 times per day and reached 229 million users.
In the United States alone, the amount the infant formula industry spent
on advertising on Reddit, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter nearly doubled
to $3.82 million in 2021 versus 2017, according to Nielsen. Companies
spent more on using digital marketing to sell infant formula last year
than on any other type of advertising, the data showed.
"Where two or three years ago less than 5% of their budgets went into
influencer marketing, now that could be anywhere from 25% to 50% of
their budget," said Maria Sipka, co-founder of influencer marketing
agency Linqia, which has worked on more than 20 campaigns for infant
nutrition brands including Nestle's Gerber Good Start #forumlaforhappiness
campaign.
Sipka said the true value of an influencer campaign is that it must not
"smell like it's a promotion".
In a Linqia client brief seen by Reuters, influencer mothers were told
by an unnamed food company that its infant formula is the only one that
contains "a probiotic clinically shown to reduce crying by up to 50% in
colicky breastfed infants" that is "ideal for formula-fed babies."
Mothers were told to "start your blog story by sharing your excitement
and enthusiasm for your partnership" with the brand, share their story
about how it provided comfort to their baby, and then ask their
followers to share their thoughts about the brand.
"I think it's OK to explain that products are scientific and to show
healthcare providers with lab coats, provided that doing so meets your
code of conduct and that there is real substance to what is being said,
that you can actually prove it through the data," a former Reckitt
Benckiser executive said.
Some, however, are more skeptical about the ads, saying their increasing
frequency is actively turning mothers away from breastfeeding.
"It's rampant on Instagram and on Facebook, it's everywhere on my
stories," New York-based lactation consultant Rebecca Four said. "I've
noticed the uptick. Does it anger us? Frustrate us? Of course."
(Reporting by Richa Naidu; Additional reporting by Sheila Dang; Editing
by Vanessa O'Connor and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |