| 
		Gold investors face bind over bars from tarnished Russia
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 01, 2022]  By 
		Peter Hobson 
 LONDON (Reuters) - Some investors want 
		Russian gold off their books but it's not that easy to remove.
 
 A de facto ban on Russian bullion minted after Moscow's invasion of 
		Ukraine -- instigated by the London market in early March -- does not 
		apply to hundreds of tonnes of gold that has been sitting in commercial 
		vaults since before the conflict started.
 
 Fund managers looking to sell the metal to avoid the deepening 
		reputational risk of holding assets linked to Russia in their portfolios 
		could trigger a costly scramble to replace it with non-Russian gold, 
		according to bankers and investors.
 
 "This would only serve to damage investors. It doesn't damage the 
		(Russian) regime," said Christopher Mellor at Invesco, whose fund has 
		around 265 tonnes of gold, 35 tonnes of it produced in Russia with a 
		market value of around $2 billion.
 
 The dilemma facing investors reflects Russia's heft in the global 
		bullion trade and its hub, the London market, where gold worth around 
		$50 billion changes hands daily in private deals.
 
 A rapid selloff of gold from Russia -- a top three supplier -- would 
		potentially disrupt that trade by undermining the principle that all 
		bars in the London trading system are interchangeable regardless of 
		their origin, according to three senior bankers at major gold trading 
		banks.
 
 To buttress the market, two of the bankers told Reuters they contacted 
		clients and rival banks to tell them they would not dump Russian bullion 
		minted before the war.
 
 
		
		 
		The bankers said they advised their customers and other traders that 
		they should do the same. They declined to be named due to the 
		confidential nature of the conversations.
 
 "I made an effort to call clients. I told them, if you demand that your 
		Russian metal is swapped out, you'll create a problem for yourself. You 
		don't want to create a scramble," one said.
 
 He said his phone lit up with calls after the London Bullion Market 
		Association (LBMA), a trade body that sets market standards, removed all 
		Russian refineries from its accredited list on March 7, meaning their 
		newly minted bars could no longer trade in London or on the COMEX 
		exchange in New York, the biggest gold futures trading venue.
 
 "There was utter confusion. Funds were saying they didn't want any 
		Russian bars in their holdings," the banker said.
 
 THE BANK OF ENGLAND
 
 Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24 in what it has called a "special 
		military operation" aimed at demilitarising Ukraine and rooting out 
		dangerous nationalists. Kyiv and the West call this a baseless pretext 
		for an aggressive land grab.
 
 The Bank of England, which operates Britain's largest gold vault, said 
		it considered Russian gold bars made before the conflict in Ukraine 
		eligible to trade because they are still on the LBMA's accredited list, 
		known as the Good Delivery List.
 
 "As far as the Bank of England is concerned, any Russian refined gold 
		produced after 8th March is not London Good Delivery. Any bars produced 
		before that remain acceptable, and we told all our customers this was 
		the case. That's just a point of fact, so we don't have any comment on 
		this," the Bank of England said in an emailed statement.
 
 
		 
		To hammer home the point that pre-invasion Russian gold was meant to be 
		treated the same as gold from other places, some banks told clients for 
		whom they stored gold that they would have to pay extra to offload 
		Russian bullion because it would breach their existing contracts, the 
		two bankers, a third banker and two gold-owning investment funds said.
 
 The bankers' conversations with clients and rivals, which have not 
		previously been reported, highlight the role played by a handful of 
		players in the London gold market, where trades happen in bilateral 
		deals.
 
 Twelve banks dominate trading in the London gold market and four of them 
		-- JPMorgan, HSBC, ICBC Standard Bank and UBS -- operate vaults. Anyone 
		trading bullion relies on their services, directly or indirectly, to 
		settle trades.
 
 JPMorgan, HSBC, ICBC Standard and UBS declined to comment when asked 
		about how they handled investor requests to sell their holdings of 
		Russian gold.
 
 The LBMA, which is made up of gold refiners, traders and banks, is not a 
		regulator, and relies on market participants to uphold its rules.
 
 The large quantity of Russian gold in the London market and Russia's 
		rapidly emerging pariah status in the wake of the Ukraine invasion, 
		however, put the banks in a difficult spot, according to lawyers and 
		market experts.
 
		
		 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			A tourist is seen reflected in perspex as he views a bar of gold 
			bullion in the museum of the Bank of England in London. Photograph 
			taken on March 25, 2008. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor/File Photo 
            
			
			 
"I think you're seeing the banking community trying to navigate a very complex 
situation," said Peter Hahn, emeritus professor at the London Institute of 
Banking & Finance.
 "The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) should question the practice to 
understand whether the actions were, generally, for the benefit of market 
participants ... and whether the practice was transparent to market 
participants."
 
The FCA, the British regulator responsible for overseeing the banks and traders 
in the London gold market, declined to comment.
 A spokesman for the LBMA said the association was "anecdotally" aware that some 
owners and traders of Russian gold have wanted to swap it out or not to deal 
with Russian gold in the future.
 
 Asked what the LBMA thought of this, the spokesman said that it "maintains a 
neutral stance provided the efficient operation of the market is unaffected."
 
 The spokesman declined to comment on bankers' efforts to prevent a sell-off of 
Russian gold. He said that the LBMA "does not distinguish between different 
types of good delivery gold".
 
 POTENTIAL LOSSES
 
 The bankers' actions appear to have worked.
 
Good delivery gold bars minted in Russia before the invasion have not traded at 
a discount to the rest of the market, according to traders. Larger investors -- 
including some exchange traded funds (ETFs) with Russian gold worth more than $1 
billion -- do not appear to have sold up.
 "Our ETFs are not able to get all Russian metals off their books at short 
notice," said a spokesperson for Zürcher Kantonalbank.
 
 
 
"The potential losses would not be compatible with our fiduciary duty to our 
clients and its sale is currently not possible due to the current situation."
 
 Zürcher Kantonalbank's current ETF stock of about 160 tonnes of gold comes 
mainly from Swiss refineries and the share of Russian gold is negligible, 
according to the spokesperson.
 
 A widespread and rapid clearout of Russian gold from investor portfolios could 
push its price down by anywhere from $1-$40 an ounce compared to non-Russian 
gold, people in the industry said.
 
 At least $12 billion worth of Russian gold is stored in vaults in London, New 
York and Zurich, according to a Reuters analysis of data from 11 large 
investment funds. The total amount is likely significantly larger but there are 
no publicly available figures to quantify it.
 
If Russian gold traded at a discount of $5 an ounce, the cost to funds of 
replacing $12 billion worth of metal would be around $34 million. 
 A Reuters analysis of investment data shows that the share of Russian gold in 
eight large ETFs actually rose to 7% on average in mid-July from 6.5% in 
mid-March.
 
 Some gold market participants have pushed ahead with selling their Russian 
holdings but they have tended to have less to offload.
 
 Britain's Royal Mint, for example, said it had Russian bars worth around $40 
million in its ETF and got rid of them by mid-March.
 
Others are trying to reduce their Russian holdings over time, asking the banks 
which store their gold to gradually cut their allocation or refusing to accept 
Russian gold bars in new deliveries. 
 
 
Asset manager Abrdn said it had asked its bank to reduce its Russian holdings. 
In mid-March, Russian gold accounted for 10% of the roughly 45 tonnes held in 
its Aberdeen Standard ETF. By mid-July, that proportion had fallen to 9.8%.
 
 Those seeking a faster exit, meanwhile, have been left in a bind.
 
 "Everyone has the same problem. Everyone wants to solve it, no one knows how," 
said a source at a major investment fund.
 
 (Additional reporting by Elisa Martinuzzi; Editing by Veronica Brown and Carmel 
Crimmins)
 
				 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |