World’s wildlife more at risk than realized - study
Send a link to a friend
[August 05, 2022]
By Gloria Dickie
LONDON (Reuters) - The world's wildlife may
be in more trouble than scientists have so far reported, new research
published on Thursday suggests.
While scientists have assessed the status of more than 147,000 plant and
animals, there are thousands of species considered too "data deficient"
for a full assessment. As a result, those species haven't been included
in the listing of threatened or endangered species, updated each year by
the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Among those underassessed species are the ocean's toothy predator, the
killer whale, along with the pink fairy armadillo of Argentina and
nearly 200 bat species worldwide.
But in some cases, that lack of data itself is a red flag - suggesting
the species may be hard to find because its population has declined,
according to a team of international scientists who used data on
environmental conditions and human threats to map patterns of extinction
threat among assessed species.
The team then looked at the 7,699 underassessed species, and estimated
that about 56% were facing conditions that likely put them also at risk
of extinction, said the study, published in the journal Communications
Biology.
That's almost double the 28% of global species classified as
"threatened" by the IUCN.
There are millions more plant and animal species that have never been
looked at by the IUCN, and scientists estimate about 1 million of them
are threatened with extinction, according to a 2019 report by the U.N.'s
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
Services.
[to top of second column]
|
An orca, or killer whale, speeds towards the beach before launching
itself onto the sand to hunt baby sea lions in Argentina's
Patagonian area of Punta Norte March 21, 2008. Picture taken March
21, 2008. REUTERS/Enrique Marcarian
Of the imperiled "data deficient" plants and animals, many "are
small-ranged species in remote places," with many in central Africa,
Madagascar and southern Asia, said study author Jan Borgelt, an
ecologist at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
The state of nature "could be worse than we realize if these
predictions are true," he said.
Worst off are likely the underassessed amphibians, with some 85%
estimated to be threatened, the study said.
Species classified by the IUCN as threatened or endangered often
become a focus for protection by national governments.
Studies such as this "highlight where conservation resources should
be allocated," said Pamela Gonzalez del Pliego, an ecologist at the
University of Évora in Portugal who was not involved in the
research.
(Reporting by Gloria Dickie in London; Editing by Katy Daigle and
Jane Merriman)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |