Explainer-What to watch out for as talks on U.S.-China audit deal drag
on
Send a link to a friend
[August 08, 2022] By
Xie Yu
HONG KONG (Reuters) - The list of Chinese
companies facing delisting risks in New York in a long-running dispute
over Chinese audits of their accounts continues to expand with the
addition of three more on Friday after e-commerce giant Alibaba's July
inclusion.
As talks between Beijing and Washington in search of a resolution drag
on, U.S. regulators and politicians have been ratcheting up calls for a
resolution, hammering out a message to China that time is running out
for both sides to strike a deal.
Here's what you need to know about the deal talks so far, and what to
watch out for in the coming months.
WHAT IS THE DISPUTE ABOUT?
U.S. regulators have been demanding complete access to the audit working
papers of New York-listed Chinese companies, essentially documents put
together during the auditing of financial statements. Authorities in
China have long been reluctant to let overseas regulators inspect
domestic accounting firms, citing security concerns.
The spat came to a head in December when the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) finalised rules that enable the prohibition of
trading in Chinese companies' shares.
Goldman Sachs estimated in March that U.S. institutional investors held
around $200 billion of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) in Chinese
firms.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED SO FAR?
Regulators from the United States and China have been in negotiations
for a deal since last year. While Beijing has in recent months said both
sides are committed to reaching a deal, Washington has been more
cautious on the outlook.
By Aug. 7, the SEC identified 162 Chinese firms listed in New York as
facing delisting risks. Trading prohibition will be imposed on a company
if it fails to comply with audit working papers requests for three
consecutive years, starting from spring, 2024.
Last week the chair of the U.S. corporate auditing watchdog said it
would not accept any restrictions on its access to the audit papers for
New York-listed Chinese companies.
HOW ARE TALKS GOING?
In March, China's Vice Premier Liu He said talks between Chinese and
U.S. regulators had made progress, and both sides were working on
specific cooperation plans. A vice chairman of China's securities
watchdog in April said he expected a deal "soon".
[to top of second column] |
The flags of China and the United States are seen printed on paper
in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/
But on the U.S. side, SEC Chair Gary Gensler said last week he would not send
public accounting inspectors to China or Hong Kong unless Washington and Beijing
can agree on complete audit access.
The U.S. Senate passed a narrow bill aimed at boosting the country's ability to
compete with China last week. Some analysts and investors have interpreted the
legislation as giving both sides another year to resolve the audit impasse: The
finalised bill removed a provision that would have accelerated the deadline for
China to meet audit requirements from early 2024 to early 2023.
WHAT'S NEXT?
The SEC earlier said the U.S. accounting regulator will have to complete on-site
inspections and investigations in China by early November. The watchdog needs to
do that in order to draw a conclusion on whether it is able to inspect or
investigate accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and in Hong Kong
registered with the U.S. regulator.
It is not immediately clear what the SEC will do after receiving the watchdog's
annual assessment for 2022. It was after the 2021 annual assessment that the SEC
started identifying public companies facing trading suspension risks.
Meanwhile, there is still a chance that in the coming months the U.S. Congress
may choose another legislative vehicle to move up the deadline for China to
comply on access to audit papers to the spring of 2023.
(Reporting by Xie Yu; Editing by Kenneth Maxwell)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|