When Deb Cohorst reached retirement age, she didn’t
expect to face possibly leaving the rural town she’s loved for close to 40
years. Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s tax hikes have not helped.
“I have lived in Illinois for almost 40 years. My husband was born and raised
here in Effingham, and we like it here. We feel like this was a great place to
raise our kids, but frankly, I’m worried how much longer we can stay here
because we are both retired. And with the rising property taxes and gas taxes,
it’s becoming harder to survive on a fixed income,” Cohorst said.
In 2019, Pritzker and the Illinois General Assembly passed 24 tax and fee hikes,
including a doubled gas tax. During Pritzker’s term, the average family has seen
a net tax hike of $2,165 and faces the second-highest property taxesnationally,
leaving fixed-income retirees such as Cohorst wondering if they’ll ever see
relief.
“Property taxes are another thing that we’re really worried about, and it scares
me we may have to move. I have friends in neighboring states, and they cannot
believe what we’re paying in property taxes,” Cohorst said. “I am paying more
for the property tax on my half-acre lot than my three out-of-state friends’
property taxes combined.”
Effingham, Illinois, is located just southeast of Springfield. The median
household income is about $52,551 and 19% of residents such as Cohorst have
reached retirement age. The average home value in Effingham is $136,000 and
families pay $2,328 in property taxes or an effective tax rate of 1.7% which is
higher than the national average of 1.1%, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
“It’s not tens of thousands like some other families pay. But when you’re on a
fixed income – and the people in this area don’t earn like what they earn in
Chicago or some of the bigger cities, at our wage level, it’s getting harder and
harder to keep up as property taxes keep increasing and we’ve seen the effect
that’s having,” Cohorst said.
When property taxes cost roughly 4.4% of your income, Cohorst and other retirees
have trouble finding spare cash to sustain never-ending tax hikes.
[to top of second column] |
Pritzker has failed to keep his campaign promise of property tax relief for
families. Instead, the median homeowner paid $2,288 more in property taxes
during his administration, according to an Illinois Policy Institute analysis.
This problem could be made worse on Nov. 8 when voters will be asked to change
the Illinois Constitution. Amendment 1is a tax hike deceptively labeled the
“Workers’ Rights Amendment.”
Amendment 1 would prevent commonsense reforms to reduce homeowners’ tax burdens
while giving government union leaders virtually limitless new ways to demand
higher costs from taxpayers. If it passes, Illinois’ trend of large annual
property tax increases will likely grow faster than ever.
Amendment 1 would guarantee the median homeowner statewide, including
fixed-income retirees such as Cohorst, see higher property tax bills of least
$2,149 during the next four years, no matter which politicians win this November
or how well they try to follow through on their promises.
Cohorst lives in Effingham County, where home ownership rates have been in
decline for the past decade. Illinois has the highest foreclosure rate of any
state. Allowing property tax hikes to increase even faster under Amendment 1
would make it harder for retirees to keep their homes and harder for young
Illinois families to realize the American Dream.
“With inflation out of control and the current state of Illinois debt
liabilities, this amendment would be devastating to not only my family but any
family. If property taxes go up, rents go up. Young people have a hard enough
time trying to obtain home ownership, an amendment like this just makes it that
much harder,” Cohorst said.
Illinoisans rarely get a say about their property taxes, but they will on Nov.
8. Illinoisans should take a hard look at Amendment 1 and what it would mean for
tax increases and the ability of Illinoisans to move into or stay in a home.
Deb Cohorst has decided: “I would not vote for Amendment 1, and I would
encourage everyone I know not to vote for it.”
|