Musk's 'joke' ManU tweet unlikely to land him regulator's red card
-legal experts
Send a link to a friend
[August 18, 2022] By
Katanga Johnson and Michelle Price
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - While the U.S.
securities regulator is likely to examine Elon Musk's tweet in which he
joked about buying New York-listed soccer club Manchester United, legal
experts say that on its face the crack is unlikely to land him in hot
water.
Musk, the world's richest person, briefly lifted the gloom over the
club's shares by tweeting on Tuesday: "I'm buying Manchester United ur
(sic) welcome," to his 103 million followers, adding later that it was a
"joke."
Even so, the 51-year-old Tesla CEO's musings ignited Manchester United
shares, which briefly jumped as much as 17% in after hours trading
before ending Wednesday at $13.67, up nearly 7% on Tuesday's close.
Known for his unconventional and irreverent style, Musk has a history of
moving stocks and cryptocurrencies with his tweets and has been locked
in a feud with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) since
tweeting in 2018 that he had funding secured to take Tesla private when
the SEC concluded he did not.
According to court and regulatory filings, the SEC has several open
investigations into Musk's subsequent tweets about Tesla and has queried
others about his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter itself, which he is now
embroiled in a legal fight to exit.
Joke or otherwise, the tweets are likely to draw scrutiny from the SEC,
given the share price move and Musk's history of skirting U.S.
securities rules, legal experts said.
"This may have been a joke to some, but it will not be to the
regulators," said Jacob Frenkel, a Washington-based attorney at
Dickinson Wright and a former SEC official. "Regulators will want to
know what motivated the tweets," said Frenkel, adding they would likely
take a hard look at trading around the tweet.
Regulators would be interested if there was evidence Musk purposely or
recklessly tried to manipulate the market, said Hui Chen, a compliance
consultant and former Justice Department lawyer.
The SEC declined to comment. Attorneys for Musk did not respond to a
request for comment.
HIGH BAR
Still, the bar for pursuing an enforcement action is high, said several
other attorneys.
[to top of second column] |
Elon Musk's twitter account and
Manchester United logo are seen in this illustration taken, August
17, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Since Musk is not a Manchester United executive he does not have the same legal
obligations to its shareholders as he does to those of Tesla, and there is no
indication that he or anyone close to him has a major financial interest in the
soccer club.
And while Musk's comments on Tesla are subject to special legal checks under a
deal he struck with the SEC to resolve its allegations that his 2018 "funding
secured" tweet broke the agency's rules, U.S. free speech protections afford
Musk plenty of leeway to comment on issues beyond his electric carmaker.
In addition, his clarification that the tweet on Manchester United was a joke
addresses the question of his intentions.
All told, it is unlikely that the SEC would be able to demonstrate that he was
trying to commit securities fraud, based on the available information, said
several attorneys.
"At least on the facts we know, I suspect it will be difficult to prove that
Musk ... acted with intent to deceive," said Robert Frenchman, a partner at
Mukasey Frenchman LLP.
Others said that Musk's track record of whimsical twitter commentary - which has
ranged from an April Fool's Day quip about Tesla going bankrupt to aliens and
the zombie apocalypse - could also be cited in his defense, were regulators or
other parties to take issue with the tweet.
It is arguable that investors now know to treat Musk's tweets with caution, said
Howard Fischer, a partner at Moses & Singer in New York.
"While Musk is already under investigation for his conduct relating to Tesla and
Twitter, it appears unlikely that this will make it a hat trick," he added.
(Reporting by Katanga Johnson and Michelle Price; editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|