Benchmarks are used by asset managers to pick investments for
clients, helping to channel millions of euros into sustainable
funds and projects, but the criteria behind them vary widely,
leading to claims of "greenwashing".
The absence of clear labelling "raises questions on the
inclusion of firms with a negative environmental or social
impact in these benchmarks," the European Securities and Markets
Authority (ESMA) said in a statement on Friday.
ESMA was responding to a public consultation from the EU's
executive European Commission on updating rules for benchmarks.
Specifying minimum methodology standards should underpin an EU
quality label, ESMA said.
"Further, ESMA believes that the introduction of an EU ESG
benchmark label would be an extra supporting tool against
greenwashing."
Compilers of ESG benchmarks based outside the EU should comply
with EU rules and supervision if they want investors inside the
bloc to use them, in order to minimise the risk of greenwashing
and regulatory arbitrage, the watchdog said.
The commission is expected to set out proposed changes to the
rules in due course, which would likely need approval from the
European Parliament and EU states.
(Reporting by Huw Jones;Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|