Twitter misled U.S. regulators on hackers, spam, whistleblower says
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [August 24, 2022]  By 
		Chavi Mehta 
		 
		(Reuters) - Twitter Inc misled federal 
		regulators about its defenses against hackers and spam accounts, the 
		social media company's former security chief Peiter Zatko said in a 
		whistleblower complaint. 
		 
		In an 84-page complaint, Zatko, a famed hacker widely known as "Mudge," 
		alleged Twitter falsely claimed it had a solid security plan, according 
		to documents relayed by congressional investigators. Twitter's shares 
		fell 7.3% to close at $39.86. 
		 
		The document alleges Twitter prioritized user growth over reducing spam, 
		with executives eligible to win individual bonuses of as much as $10 
		million tied to increases in daily users, and nothing explicitly for 
		cutting spam. 
		 
		Twitter labeled the complaint a "false narrative." The social media 
		company has been battling Elon Musk in court after the world's richest 
		person attempted to pull out of a $44-billion deal to buy Twitter. Musk 
		said it failed to provide details about the prevalence of bot and spam 
		accounts. 
		 
		Tesla Inc Chief Executive Musk had offered to buy Twitter for $54.20 per 
		share, saying he believed it could be a global platform for free speech.
		 
		  
						
		
		  
						
		 
		Twitter and Musk have sued each other, with Twitter asking a judge on 
		the Delaware Court of Chancery to order Musk to close the deal. A trial 
		is scheduled for Oct. 17. 
		 
		Zatko filed the complaint last month with the U.S. Securities and 
		Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, as well as the 
		Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The complaint was also sent to 
		congressional committees.  
		 
		"We are reviewing the redacted claims that have been published but what 
		we have seen so far is a false narrative that is riddled with 
		inconsistencies and inaccuracies," Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal 
		told employees in a memo. 
		 
		The Senate Judiciary Committee's top Republican, Chuck Grassley, said 
		the complaint raised serious national security concerns and privacy 
		issues and needed to be investigated. 
		 
		"Take a tech platform that collects massive amounts of user data, 
		combine it with what appears to be an incredibly weak security 
		infrastructure, and infuse it with foreign state actors with an agenda, 
		and you’ve got a recipe for disaster," he said. 
		 
		The FTC declined to comment. A spokesperson for the Senate Intelligence 
		Committee said it had received the complaint and was setting up a 
		meeting to discuss the allegation.  
		 
		Twitter's real regulatory risk lies in whether the documentary evidence 
		shows "knowing or reckless misleading" of investors or regulators, said 
		Howard Fischer, a partner at Moses & Singer and a former SEC attorney. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            
			A Twitter logo is seen outside the 
			company's headquarters in San Francisco, California, U.S., April 25, 
			2022. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo 
            
			
			  
'GIVE A LITTLE WHISTLE'  
 
Musk could not be reached for comment but reacted on Twitter with memes and 
emoji of a robot. Musk's legal team has subpoenaed Zatko, CNN reported after the 
whistleblower disclosure was made public.  
 
American hackers have admired Zatko since the 1990s, when he was credited with 
inventing a tool to crack passwords. He later used his hacking chops to become a 
sought-after security consultant and with other rebellious techies of the era, 
transitioned to top government and boardroom positions. 
 
The whistleblower document says that after the Jan. 6 riots, the incoming Biden 
administration offered him "a day-one appointed position as Chief Information 
Security Officer for the United States," which he turned down.  
 
Cybersecurity leaders expressed widespread support for Zatko, and many deplored 
Twitter's reaction to his revelations. 
 
Robert Lee, founder of industrial cybersecurity company Dragos, said it was "one 
of the very rare times based on who it is I don't even need to know a detail to 
form an opinion," he said on Twitter. "If Mudge is making this type of claim, it 
deserves the investigation." 
 
In January, Twitter said Zatko was no longer its head of security, two years 
after his appointment to the role. 
 
On Tuesday, a Twitter spokesperson said Zatko was fired for "ineffective 
leadership and poor performance," adding his allegations appeared designed to 
capture attention and inflict harm on Twitter, its customers and its 
shareholders. 
			 
  
Debra Katz and Alexis Ronickher, attorneys for Zatko, said in a statement that 
throughout his tenure at Twitter, he repeatedly raised concerns about inadequate 
information security systems to the company's executive committee, CEO and 
board. Twitter did not respond to a request for comment on that statement.  
 
(Reporting by Chavi Mehta, Ankur Banerjee and Tiyashi Datta in Bengaluru, Peter 
Henderson in Oakland and Raphael Satter in Washington; Additional reporting by 
Rick Cowan in Washington; Writing by Ankur Banerjee; Editing by Kenneth Li, 
Saumyadeb Chakrabarty, Sriraj Kalluvila and David Gregorio) 
				 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.  |