Explainer-How a Thai court suspended Prime Minister Prayuth
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [August 24, 2022]  
		BANGKOK (Reuters) - A 
		decision by Thailand's Constitutional Court to suspend Prime Minister 
		Prayuth Chan-ocha from official duties on Wednesday was a blow to the 
		former army chief who first came to power when he toppled an elected 
		government in a 2014 coup. 
		 
		The decision was a rare, though possibly brief, victory for opposition 
		parties that have sought to loosen Prayuth's hold on power through 
		elections, parliamentary manoeuvres and legal cases.  
		 
		WHAT LED TO THE SUSPENSION? 
		 
		The court suspended Prayuth while it considers a petition that he has 
		reached an eight-year term limit set for prime ministers in the 2017 
		constitution written by a military appointed committee after the coup 
		and passed in a referendum. 
		 
		The petition - by opposition parties that have failed to oust Prayuth in 
		four no-confidence votes - says that because the army junta Prayuth led 
		named him prime minister in August 2014, a few months after the coup, he 
		reached the limit this week. 
		 
		Wednesday's decision by the court was to accept and investigate that 
		petition.  
		 
		Some Prayuth supporters argue his premiership in fact started in 2017, 
		when the new constitution came into force. 
		
		  
		
		Others date Prayuth's term to 2019, when his pro-army party contested 
		and won elections. Later that year, parliament elected him as civilian 
		prime minister in a process opposition politicians have said was skewed 
		to favour pro-army candidates. Prayuth's government says the elections 
		were free and fair. 
		 
		WHO IS IN CHARGE NOW? 
		 
		Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan, 77, will be the interim leader 
		after the court suspended Prayuth, government spokesman Anucha 
		Burapachaisri told reporters. 
		 
		Prawit, himself a former army chief, is a longtime royalist figure and 
		considered a political kingmaker in the conservative movement. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
             
            
			  
            Thailand's Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha 
			wipes his face during a family photo session with new cabinet 
			ministers at the Government House in Bangkok, Thailand August 13, 
			2020. REUTERS/Jorge Silva/File Photo 
            
			
			
			  
            If the court were to later rule Prayuth had reached his term limit, 
			the elected parliament would then pick a new prime minister from 
			among qualified candidates who ran in the 2019 election. 
			 
			Prayuth's Palang Pracharat party heads a 17-party coalition in 
			parliament that should, combined with the votes of a 
			military-selected Senate, give it enough votes to decide the next 
			prime minister. 
			 
			WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 
			 
			The court has given Prayuth 15 days to respond to his suspension. 
			But it did not set a timeline to issue a ruling on the petition 
			itself. 
			 
			COULD PRAYUTH BE RESTORED? 
			 
			Yes. If the court rules that Prayuth's term officially began in 2017 
			or 2019, he could be re-instated. 
			 
			That would mean he could stay in power until 2025 or 2027, depending 
			on the results of the next elections. 
			 
			COULD THERE BE ELECTIONS SOON? 
			 
			The next elections are due by May next year under the constitution, 
			but a sitting prime minister has the power to call early elections 
			by dissolving the elected House of Representatives.  
			 
			In that case, an election would be held within 60 days after a house 
			dissolution. 
			 
			However, ruling party members have said elections are unlikely until 
			after Thailand hosts the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders' 
			summit in November in Bangkok. 
			 
			(Reporting by Panu Wongcha-um and Panarat Thepgumpanat; Writing by 
			Kay Johnson; Editing by Clarence Fernandez) 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.  |