U.S. Justice Dept. poised to release redacted affidavit on Trump search
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [August 26, 2022]  
		By Sarah N. Lynch 
		 
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice 
		Department is expected to make public on Friday a redacted version of 
		the affidavit that led to the Aug. 8 FBI search of former president 
		Donald Trump's Florida home, a move that could shed more light on the 
		evidence that led to the unprecedented search. 
		 
		U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart on Thursday ordered the redacted 
		document to be released by noon (1600 GMT) on Friday, a ruling that came 
		just hours after a Justice Department spokesman confirmed that 
		prosecutors had submitted a sealed copy of the affidavit with proposed 
		redactions for the judge's review. 
		 
		Reinhart, who approved the warrant that preceded the FBI search of 
		Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, ordered a partial release of 
		the affidavit despite objections from prosecutors who wanted to keep the 
		entire thing sealed to protect the integrity of their ongoing 
		investigation. 
		 
		The affidavit, a document that is not usually made public unless someone 
		is charged with a crime, is a sworn statement outlining the evidence 
		that gave the department probable cause to seek a search warrant.  
		 
		Just how much the redacted affidavit will reveal remains to be seen.  
		  
		
		
		  
		
		 
		In his order on Thursday, Reinhart said the Justice Department had valid 
		reasons to keep some of the document secret, including the need to 
		protect the identities of witnesses and federal agents as well as the 
		government's investigation and strategy and grand jury material.  
		 
		"The government has met its burden of showing that its proposed 
		redactions are narrowly tailored to serve the government's legitimate 
		interest in the integrity of the ongoing investigation and are the least 
		onerous alternative to sealing the entire affidavit," Reinhart wrote. 
		 
		The FBI in its court-approved search at Mar-a-Lago carried away more 
		than 20 boxes containing 11 sets of classified government records, some 
		of which were labeled "top secret."  
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Former U.S. President Donald Trump's 
			Mar-a-Lago resort is seen in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., February 8, 
			2021. REUTERS/Marco Bello/File Photo 
            
			
			
			  
            The search was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump 
			illegally removed and kept documents from the White House when he 
			left office in January 2021 and whether he tried to obstruct the 
			government's investigation. 
			 
			The documents the FBI seized were in addition to 700 pages worth of 
			classified records the U.S. National Archives recovered from Mar-a-Lago 
			in January, some of which entailed Special Access Program materials, 
			a reference to security protocols reserved for the country's most 
			closely-held secrets. 
			 
			After Trump accused the FBI of political retribution against him, 
			Attorney General Merrick Garland made the unusual decision to 
			confirm the existence of the department's investigation and asked a 
			court to unseal large portions of the search warrant and property 
			receipt listing the seized items. 
			 
			The department declined to release the affidavit, prompting media 
			companies to file a legal challenge to get it unsealed. 
			 
			Trump on social media called for the document to be unsealed, though 
			his lawyers had not weighed in on the matter. 
			 
			He has filed a separate civil case asking another judge to halt the 
			FBI's review of the seized records pending the appointment of a 
			special master to independently review them for materials that could 
			be protected under executive privilege, a legal principle that lets 
			a president shield some information. 
			 
			U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has asked Trump's legal team to 
			file a more targeted request by Friday that better explains what 
			relief the former president is seeking and why his request should 
			not be sent instead to Reinhart. 
			 
			(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Scott Malone and Kim 
			Coghill) 
            
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
            
			
			   |