Pandemic's impact on U.S. productivity may be a wash, research shows
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [August 27, 2022]  By 
		Howard Schneider 
		 
		JACKSON, Wyo. (Reuters) - The coronavirus pandemic touched off a 
		scramble among U.S. firms and households to adapt their work lives and 
		business models, with work-from-home arrangements and teleconferencing 
		tools boosting what some employees could do, and new technology helping 
		even the smallest cafes do more with less. 
		 
		But the crisis also brought a wave of inefficiency in the form of 
		snarled supply chains, time and money spent on cleaning and health 
		management, and hiring difficulties that still keep some businesses 
		below capacity. 
		 
		The net result of all the tumult may, it turns out, be a wash in terms 
		of the U.S. economy's underlying potential, with little change in 
		productivity or trend growth, and a still looming drag from demographics 
		as the population ages, according to new research presented at the 
		Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual Jackson Hole research symposium in 
		Wyoming. 
		 
		"We find little evidence that the pandemic has so far caused substantial 
		changes, up or down, to the economy's sluggish pre-pandemic longer-run 
		growth-rate," which remains anchored between 1.50% and 1.75%, as it was 
		before the greatest health crisis in a century, San Francisco Fed 
		economists John Fernald and Huiyu Li wrote in the research paper. 
						
		
		  
						
		While the innovation of the pandemic's first months fueled a surge of 
		productivity that some felt might raise the economy's potential, the 
		productivity numbers just as quickly crashed in a cyclical pattern the 
		authors say is common during and after recessions and in this case 
		appears to have left things largely where they were. 
		 
		If some array of firms did well - and the research paper found that 
		those where employees could telework saw "strong pandemic productivity" 
		- problems elsewhere went in the other direction. 
		 
		"The performance of goods-producing industries is poor; the performance 
		of contact-intensive industries is atrocious," the research paper 
		concluded. Economy-wide, "the pandemic productivity data are not, on 
		net, anything to get too excited about ... Despite considerable 
		commentary to the contrary, aggregate productivity has behaved in 
		surprisingly predictable cyclical ways." 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            Employees laid off from Farley’s East 
			cafe, that closed due to the financial crisis caused by the 
			coronavirus disease (COVID-19), collect food items at the cafe in 
			Oakland, California, U.S. March 18, 2020. Picture taken March 18, 
			2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo 
            
			
			  
If the risk is to one side or the other, they wrote, it is that the COVID-19 
crisis at the margins "reduced the level of potential output" in the United 
States by depressing the number of people in the workforce. 
 
HARD TO PREDICT 
 
The bottom line may yet change. Productivity is considered notoriously hard to 
predict. Technology can take time to spread - then surprise when its impact on 
growth becomes apparent. 
 
"Artificial intelligence and robots may eventually bring a massive productivity 
payoff - but we do not know when it will happen," the San Francisco Fed 
economists wrote. 
 
Likewise, workers who stayed out of the economy for health or other reasons may 
eventually return. 
 
But the findings are notable. Fernald has been one of the Fed economists most 
focused on productivity, and the future landscape he outlines would be tough for 
Fed policymakers to navigate. 
 
Rising productivity is the economist's equivalent of a magic bullet. If each 
worker produces more per hour, the economy can still expand even if the size of 
the labor force itself isn't growing. Wages can also increase without feeding 
inflation since an employer is getting more product to sell for each dollar paid 
to workers. 
 
The opposite is also true: If productivity is poor, then either growth also 
remains slow or inflation pressures increase. The alternative is to bring more 
people into the labor market, and the choices there - more immigration or a 
change in birth rates - are beyond Fed policy. 
 
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao) 
				 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] 
			 
			This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			   |