Pandemic's impact on U.S. productivity may be a wash, research shows
Send a link to a friend
[August 27, 2022] By
Howard Schneider
JACKSON, Wyo. (Reuters) - The coronavirus pandemic touched off a
scramble among U.S. firms and households to adapt their work lives and
business models, with work-from-home arrangements and teleconferencing
tools boosting what some employees could do, and new technology helping
even the smallest cafes do more with less.
But the crisis also brought a wave of inefficiency in the form of
snarled supply chains, time and money spent on cleaning and health
management, and hiring difficulties that still keep some businesses
below capacity.
The net result of all the tumult may, it turns out, be a wash in terms
of the U.S. economy's underlying potential, with little change in
productivity or trend growth, and a still looming drag from demographics
as the population ages, according to new research presented at the
Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual Jackson Hole research symposium in
Wyoming.
"We find little evidence that the pandemic has so far caused substantial
changes, up or down, to the economy's sluggish pre-pandemic longer-run
growth-rate," which remains anchored between 1.50% and 1.75%, as it was
before the greatest health crisis in a century, San Francisco Fed
economists John Fernald and Huiyu Li wrote in the research paper.
While the innovation of the pandemic's first months fueled a surge of
productivity that some felt might raise the economy's potential, the
productivity numbers just as quickly crashed in a cyclical pattern the
authors say is common during and after recessions and in this case
appears to have left things largely where they were.
If some array of firms did well - and the research paper found that
those where employees could telework saw "strong pandemic productivity"
- problems elsewhere went in the other direction.
"The performance of goods-producing industries is poor; the performance
of contact-intensive industries is atrocious," the research paper
concluded. Economy-wide, "the pandemic productivity data are not, on
net, anything to get too excited about ... Despite considerable
commentary to the contrary, aggregate productivity has behaved in
surprisingly predictable cyclical ways."
[to top of second column] |
Employees laid off from Farley’s East
cafe, that closed due to the financial crisis caused by the
coronavirus disease (COVID-19), collect food items at the cafe in
Oakland, California, U.S. March 18, 2020. Picture taken March 18,
2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo
If the risk is to one side or the other, they wrote, it is that the COVID-19
crisis at the margins "reduced the level of potential output" in the United
States by depressing the number of people in the workforce.
HARD TO PREDICT
The bottom line may yet change. Productivity is considered notoriously hard to
predict. Technology can take time to spread - then surprise when its impact on
growth becomes apparent.
"Artificial intelligence and robots may eventually bring a massive productivity
payoff - but we do not know when it will happen," the San Francisco Fed
economists wrote.
Likewise, workers who stayed out of the economy for health or other reasons may
eventually return.
But the findings are notable. Fernald has been one of the Fed economists most
focused on productivity, and the future landscape he outlines would be tough for
Fed policymakers to navigate.
Rising productivity is the economist's equivalent of a magic bullet. If each
worker produces more per hour, the economy can still expand even if the size of
the labor force itself isn't growing. Wages can also increase without feeding
inflation since an employer is getting more product to sell for each dollar paid
to workers.
The opposite is also true: If productivity is poor, then either growth also
remains slow or inflation pressures increase. The alternative is to bring more
people into the labor market, and the choices there - more immigration or a
change in birth rates - are beyond Fed policy.
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|