Cryptoverse: Bleeding bitcoin's holding out for a hero
Send a link to a friend
[August 30, 2022] By
Lisa Pauline Mattackal and Medha Singh
(Reuters) - Who can save bitcoin?
The world's biggest cryptocurrency can't seem to catch a break. It
finally looked to be regaining strength this month, breaching $25,000
for the first time since its June collapse, only to relapse towards
$20,000.
A deflating end to August has forced the market to confront the Big
Bitcoin Question: where will a real rally come from?
Right now, doughty retail investors are looking like the most likely
source of relief, as institutional players get cold feet in the midst of
a macro maelstrom.
The amount of "illiquid bitcoin" across the market - held by wallets
that rarely spend or sell - has risen by 73,840 bitcoin over the past
week, the largest weekly increase for more than two months, according to
Chainalysis data. That equates to roughly $1.7 billion at recent prices.
Furthermore, the amount of bitcoin held for over a year has increased by
54,300 on average in the last four weeks, the largest rise in about four
months, Chainalysis said. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency exchanges have seen
net outflows for three straight months as investors pulled their tokens
into "cold storage" rather than selling, according to Arcane Research.
"It's clear that longer-term holders at the retail level are also
accumulating, the number of wallets holding relatively small amounts of
bitcoin is indeed growing," said Jay Fraser, head of strategy at BSTX
securities exchange.
"Don't underestimate the impact of the retail HODLers," Fraser added,
referring to a cohort whose name emerged years ago from a trader
misspelling "hold" on an online forum. "Their lack of selling helps to
create more scarcity so that, eventually, a supply shock for bitcoin
will again play out."
INSTITUTIONS 'DROVE MARKET DOWN'
So what about those deep-pocketed institutional players that jumped on
the crypto bandwagon when prices were high?
They have been selling hard, according to some market participants who
say these big investors have been the primary driver of the crypto slump
over recent months.
[to top of second column] |
Representations of cryptocurrency
Bitcoin are seen in this illustration, August 10, 2022. REUTERS/Dado
Ruvic/Illustration
In the week to Aug. 19 - the week that saw bitcoin slide anew - the digital
asset investment products favored by traditional institutional finance players
saw outflows of around $9 million according to Coinshares data.
"The latecomers - institutions that came in close to the highs or the $30,000 to
$50,000 levels - they're the ones that drove the market down, mostly," said Ed
Hindi, chief investment officer at Tyr Capital Partners.
Hindi pointed to a steep discount between futures contract prices and the
bitcoin spot price on the CME exchange as further evidence of institutional
bearishness.
The discount for the most traded contract hit an all-time low of 3.36% last
week, Arcane Research analysts said.
'READY TO BUY THE DIP'
But don't count institutional players out - there's plenty of evidence they
haven't given up on bitcoin, which is down a whopping 70% since its all-time
high of $69,000 touched in November, and has lost 56% since the start of 2022.
Some market watchers point to the decision of BlackRock, the world's largest
asset manager, to launch a private bitcoin investment product specifically for
institutional investors as a strong sign that demand remains strong and could
drag crypto out of the doldrums.
Andy Edstrom, managing director of Swan Advisor Services, said his firm had
continued to see interest from financial advisors and their clients in bitcoin
investments despite some "fair weather interest" going away.
"Some advisors are ready to buy the dip, they're telling us 'I've got dry powder
to invest in $20,000 bitcoin'," he added.
(Reporting by Lisa Pauline Mattackal and Medha Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by
Pravin Char)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |