Illinois Supreme Court considers liability in aftermath of fatal crime
Send a link to a friend
[December 09, 2022]
By Andrew Hensel | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – The Illinois Supreme Court is considering a case
to determine whether three individuals who broke into a store before
leading police on a car chase, crash and fatal shooting should be
responsible for their injuries.
In 2012, Leland Dudley, John Givens, and David Strong broke into an
electronics store on Western Avenue in Chicago. During their getaway,
they smashed their van through a closed metal garage door directly into
the Chicago Police Department while officers gathered outside. One
officer was struck in the crash.
Police then fired 76 shots, killing Strong. The state charged the men
with the murder of their co-conspirator.
Attorney Ellen McLaughlin, who represented the city of Chicago, claims
the individuals intentions were clear because they were fleeing a crime.
"Givens and Dudley were by degrees recklessly or intentionally willful
and wanton in bringing about their own injuries," McLaughlin said.
"Willful and wanton conduct" means a course of action that shows an
actual or deliberate intention to cause harm or which, if not
intentional, shows an utter indifference to or conscious disregard for
the safety of others or their property.
[to top of second column]
|
Attorney Ellen McLaughlin presenting to
the Illinois Supreme Court last month - BlueRoomStream
Representing the charged men was Lynn Dowd. Dowd said an appellate court
decision, which overturned a lower court ruling, was correct in not
blaming the men.
"For the plaintiff, we have to prove duty breach, proximate cause, and
damages," Dowd said. "After we've proven that, which we did ... the jury
importantly determined that the city was willful and wanton."
Dudley, Givens, and Strong's estate sued the city, alleging battery,
survival and wrongful death.
Dowd called the CPD response to the situation reckless.
"We did not ask the jury to make a distinction between the city's
conduct and whether it was intentional or reckless in firing 76 rounds
of bullets into a van," Dowd said.
McLaughlin said the defendants broke the law.
"The facts do establish that Givens and Dudley engaged in conduct that
was intentionally willful and wanton on the civil tort standards,"
McLaughlin claims.
The supreme court took the case under advisement.
Andrew Hensel has years of experience as a reporter and
pre-game host for the Joliet Slammers, and as a producer for the Windy
City Bulls. A graduate of Iowa Wesleyan University and Illinois Media
School, Andrew lives in the south suburbs of Chicago. |