Exclusive-U.S. Justice Dept is split over charging Binance as crypto
world falters - sources
Send a link to a friend
[December 12, 2022] By
Angus Berwick, Dan Levine and Tom Wilson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Splits between U.S. Department of Justice
prosecutors are delaying the conclusion of a long-running criminal
investigation into the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange Binance,
four people familiar with the matter have told Reuters.
The investigation began in 2018 and is focused on Binance's compliance
with U.S. anti-money laundering laws and sanctions, these people said.
Some of the at least half dozen federal prosecutors involved in the case
believe the evidence already gathered justifies moving aggressively
against the exchange and filing criminal charges against individual
executives including founder Changpeng Zhao, said two of the sources.
Others have argued taking time to review more evidence, the sources
said.
The inquiry involves prosecutors at three Justice Department offices:
the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, known as MLARS, the
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Washington in Seattle
and the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team. Justice Department
regulations say that money laundering charges against a financial
institution must be approved by the MLARS chief. Leaders from the other
two offices, along with higher-level DOJ officials, would likely also
have to sign off on any action against Binance, three of the sources
said.
Through interviews with almost a dozen people familiar with the case,
including current and former U.S. law enforcement officials and ex-Binance
advisors, along with a review of company records, Reuters has pieced
together the most comprehensive account so far of how the investigation
developed and how Binance has sought to keep it at bay. Prosecutors'
deliberations on charging Binance have not been previously reported.
The stakes are high for the deeply troubled crypto sector. If the
investigation goes against Binance and Zhao, it could loosen Binance's
grip on the industry. Its hold has been strengthened by the recent
collapse of rival exchange FTX.
Binance's defense attorneys at U.S. law firm Gibson Dunn have held
meetings in recent months with Justice Department officials, the four
people said. Among Binance's arguments: A criminal prosecution would
wreak havoc on a crypto market already in a prolonged downturn. The
discussions included potential plea deals, according to three of the
sources.
A Binance spokesperson said, "We don't have any insight into the inner
workings of the US Justice Department, nor would it be appropriate for
us to comment if we did." The Justice Department declined to comment.
The charges under investigation are unlicensed money transmission, money
laundering conspiracy and criminal sanctions violations, the four people
said. No final charging decisions have been made, though prosecutors
consider Zhao and some other executives to be subjects of the
investigation, one source familiar with the situation said. Ultimately,
the Justice Department could bring indictments against Binance and its
executives, negotiate a settlement, or close the case without taking any
action at all.
Little has been revealed about the case. Reuters reported previously
that in 2020, prosecutors requested extensive internal records from
Binance about its anti-money laundering checks, along with
communications involving Zhao and other executives.
The new reporting shows that the case has shadowed Binance for most of
its five years in existence, shaping Zhao's management of the company
while he drove its explosive growth around the world. He instigated a
recruitment spree last year that led to the hiring of officials from the
Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation division, the U.S.
government agency that was investigating Binance. He enforced strict
secrecy rules on employees, telling them to use email as little as
possible and to communicate using encrypted messaging services,
according to company messages that Reuters has previously reported.
Reuters has investigated Binance's financial crime compliance over the
course of 2022. The reporting showed that Binance kept weak anti-money
laundering controls, processed over $10 billion in payments for
criminals and companies seeking to evade U.S. sanctions, and plotted to
evade regulators in the United States and elsewhere.
Binance has disputed the articles, calling the illicit-fund calculations
inaccurate and the descriptions of its compliance controls "outdated."
The exchange has said it is "driving higher industry standards" and
seeking to "further improve our ability to detect illegal crypto
activity on our platform."
Launched by Zhao in Shanghai in 2017, Binance now dominates the crypto
industry. The exchange processed trades worth around $1.6 trillion in
October, about half of the entire crypto market's trading volume. That
sum dwarfed its former challenger FTX, which handled $230 billion in
trades that month, according to data site CryptoCompare.
FTX imploded in early November, triggering a wave of public demands for
greater regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. Founder Sam Bankman-Fried
had boasted his exchange was the "most regulated," but he based it in
the Bahamas, where oversight was light, and secretly used customer
deposits. The Justice Department has opened an investigation into FTX's
handling of company funds, Reuters has reported. In a bankruptcy
hearing, attorneys for FTX said the exchange was run as a "personal
fiefdom" of Bankman-Fried. Bankman-Fried says he didn't knowingly commit
any wrongdoing.
Sources familiar with Justice Department operations said it is as yet
unclear whether this new probe will add impetus to the investigation
into Binance or slow it down.
Zhao, who declines to disclose the location or entity behind his own
exchange, accelerated his rival's fall by announcing that Binance would
sell its holding of FTX's digital token. This sparked a surge of user
withdrawals, ultimately forcing FTX to file for bankruptcy.
In a blog post several days later, Zhao wrote that Binance "must lead by
example" going forward. "We cannot let a few bad actors sully the
reputation of this industry," he wrote.
"LAWYER UP"
Prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle began investigating
Binance in 2018, following a wave of cases that saw criminals use
Binance to move illicit funds, the four people familiar with the probe
said.
The Seattle office partnered with MLARS to pursue the case, along with
agents from the IRS Criminal Investigation division.
Binance began to address the chances of U.S. enforcement action that
year. A summary of a company meeting in October 2018, attended by Zhao,
said, "Lawyer up in the US, address regulatory risks."
The U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, designed to protect the U.S. financial system
from illicit finance, requires crypto exchanges to register with the
Treasury Department and comply with anti-money laundering requirements
if they conduct "substantial" business in the United States. Binance has
never done so, despite almost a third of its users being U.S.-based the
year of its launch, according to a company blog post.
[to top of second column] |
Representation of cryptocurrency Binance
Coin, the native token of the cryptocurrency exchange, is seen in
this illustration taken November 29, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File
Photo
Instead, Zhao approved a proposal from a person providing advice to
Binance to "insulate" Binance from U.S. scrutiny by setting up a new
American exchange that would draw regulators' attention away from
the main platform, as reported by Reuters in October. Zhao became
concerned about U.S. authorities gaining access to Binance's
internal records, company messages show.
A guide issued to employees for one encrypted messaging service
listed its "automatic self-erasing messages" as a benefit.
Until 2020, Binance's legal department operated on bare bones. Its
head of legal, Jared Gross, was a former mergers and acquisitions
lawyer with little experience in dealing with authorities, according
to two people who worked with him. Faced with the Justice Department
investigation, Binance hired an external lawyer from U.S. law firm
Paul Weiss, Roberto Gonzalez, who was previously Treasury's deputy
general counsel. Gross, who left Binance last year, did not respond
to messages and phone calls. Gonzalez and Paul Weiss didn't comment.
In December 2020, two MLARS attorneys and a Seattle prosecutor sent
the DOJ's request for documents to Binance, addressed to Gonzalez.
The letter sought any records containing instructions that
"documents be destroyed, altered, or removed from Binance's files"
or that "information should not be committed to writing." The
request asked for communications involving Zhao and 12 other Binance
executives and advisors.
Several days later, an advisor to one of the people named in the
letter received a panicked phone call from this person. The caller
told the advisor that Binance was struggling to respond to the DOJ
because many of the records relevant to the Department's request had
already been erased due to Zhao's secrecy rules. This extended, the
person told the advisor, to Zhao's approvals for financial decisions
at Binance.US, the separate American exchange which publicly says it
is "fully independent" of the main Binance platform.
A Binance.US spokesperson said Reuters' questions were "fueled with
false insinuations," and Binance.US was a separate entity with its
own leadership team who are "solely responsible for overseeing
decisions and activity across the business."
Text messages and phone records reviewed by Reuters confirm the call
took place and that it concerned the Department's December 2020
letter. The advisor described the contents of the call on the
condition that Reuters not identify the advisor or the caller.
Reuters, which was the first to disclose the request publicly, could
not determine how Binance ultimately responded to the DOJ letter.
NEW TASKFORCE
The following year, Binance began a recruitment blitz. It hired at
least five ex-officials from the IRS Criminal Investigation's Cyber
Crime Unit, including a new global head of investigations called
Tigran Gambaryan. Binance said Gambaryan's team would detect and
prevent crimes on the platform and work closely with law
enforcement.
As an IRS-CI special agent, Gambaryan had helped lead investigations
into several notorious crypto crime operations, such as the Silk
Road darknet drugs marketplace and a child abuse site called Dark
Scandals, whose operations Reuters detailed in an article last
month. Gambaryan was not involved in the Binance investigation at
IRS-CI, but was close to agents that were, according to two people
who worked with him.
His hiring was part of a recruitment program by Binance among law
enforcement officials in the United States, offering salaries that
far exceeded what was available at many other finance and crypto
firms, according to four people familiar with the outreach.
Gambaryan didn't respond to a request for comment. Binance told
Reuters, "We are proud to have in our ranks some of the most
celebrated cyber investigators representing virtually every single
major international law enforcement agency across the globe."
Binance said they have around 300 investigators working "to protect
users from illicit actors."
In August 2021, Binance ended a policy that allowed users to open
accounts with solely an email address. Reuters has reported
previously that criminals ranging from Russian drug traffickers to
North Korean hackers had exploited this feature to move money
anonymously through Binance.
But even after Binance required all users to submit identification,
gaps remained in its compliance programme. For example, between then
and this November, Binance processed over $1 billion in trades for
Iranian crypto firms, putting the company at risk of violating U.S
sanctions, Reuters reported last month.
In October 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced the
creation of a National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) to
tackle investigations of "criminal misuses of cryptocurrency,
particularly crimes committed by virtual currency exchanges."
Monaco, in a separate speech that month, said the Justice
Department's "first priority in corporate criminal matters" was to
prosecute individuals who profit from corporate wrongdoing.
The Justice Department appointed Eun Young Choi, previously Monaco's
senior counsel, as NCET's first director. Under Choi, NCET began
coordinating the Binance investigation, joining the U.S. Attorney's
Office in Seattle and MLARS, according to the four people familiar
with the case. Agents gathered evidence from former Binance
employees and business partners, they said.
In recent months, prosecutors at NCET and the Seattle office
concluded they had sufficient evidence to prepare charges not only
against Binance, but also against Zhao and some other executives,
the people said. However, MLARS leadership has been hesitant to move
forward with an indictment, leading to frustrations within the
investigation team, the people said.
MLARS has a reputation in the Justice Department for moving slowly
in reaching prosecution decisions, people familiar with its
activities said. In October, however, the Department appointed a new
MLARS chief, Brent Wible, who previously worked in the Fraud Section
and before that as a prosecutor in the Southern District of New
York. Both of those offices are known, among current and former law
enforcement officials, for pursuing cases more aggressively.
Binance has hired a former chief of MLARS, Kendall Day, a partner at
Gibson Dunn, to engage in discussions with the Justice Department.
Day met with Justice officials in Washington in recent months, three
of the people said. Officials discussed with Day a possible
resolution to the case out of court, whereby suspects would
potentially plead guilty or pay a fine, the three sources said. Day
didn't comment.
((reporting by Angus Berwick in Washington, Dan Levine in San
Francisco and Tom Wilson in London; editing by Janet McBride))
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |