Harry and Meghan's Netflix series wraps up - but what is the effect on
the royals?
Send a link to a friend
[December 16, 2022]
By Michael Holden
LONDON (Reuters) - Beyond the drama of feuding brothers and
Machiavellian royal aides working with a hostile press, the key issue
which arises from Prince Harry and his wife Meghan's Netflix documentary
is whether it does lasting damage to King Charles and the British
monarchy.
Over six hours of television, Harry and Meghan delivered a swathe of
accusations against what they portrayed as a tone-deaf institution which
was unconcerned about their emotional well-being and prepared for them
to suffer if it meant better media coverage for other more senior
royals.
"It's like living through a soap opera where everybody else views you as
entertainment," Harry said in one of the final episodes released on
Thursday.
When the couple married in a glittering ceremony in 2018, their union
was hailed as a breath of fresh air, the epitome of a modern monarchy:
the then-hugely popular prince and the glamorous, biracial, American
actress.
But as they recounted in graphic detail in their documentary series,
that fairytale soon turned sour amid a slew of negative press coverage,
some of which Harry blamed on those working for Prince William, his
elder brother and now heir to the throne.
"It looked cold, but it also felt cold," Harry said of his family's
feelings towards him at their last official engagement. In 2020, the
couple decided to step back from their royal roles, moving to California
and becoming financially independent.
The exit of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex was bad news for the
institution, said Catherine Mayer, author of recent biography "Charles:
Heart of a King".
"The departure of Meghan and Harry from royal ranks has been far more
damaging to the monarchy than the coverage that vilifies them
understands or accepts," she told Reuters.
"Her arrival was this source of enormous hope for people of colour, and
also just younger people. Her departure is seen as a failure and a
betrayal, and that's immensely damaging to the monarchy because the
monarchy needs consensus to survive. It needs support to survive, and
it's losing it."
But opinion polls suggest that may not be the case. According to a
YouGov poll last week, Harry, who once topped such ratings, and Meghan
are now the most unpopular royals in Britain apart from his uncle Prince
Andrew, who settled a U.S. sex abuse lawsuit in February. William and
his wife Kate were the most popular, although surveys show younger
people are much more ambivalent than older Britons about the monarchy in
general.
[to top of second column]
|
Britain's Prince Harry, left, an Meghan,
Duchess of Sussex, leave after they paid their respects to Queen
Elizabeth II in Westminster Hall for the Lying-in State, in London,
Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2022. Emilio Morenatti/Pool via REUTERS
The royals have been in a similar
position before. In the early 1990s, the disintegration of Charles's
marriage to his first wife, Harry's mother the late Princess Diana,
was played out in the full glare of the media.
Following Diana's public accusations against the royal household and
her death in 1997, the future of the 1,000-year-old institution
seemed at times uncertain. But it bounced back to become more
popular than ever, with Harry and his brother William to the fore.
According to Harry, the subsequent popularity of Meghan was seen as
a problem, stealing the limelight from those "born to do this", a
less than subtle dig at his brother and father.
If Harry's assessment that negative stories were being planted
against him and Meghan is true - an accusation rejected by
newspapers and aides who have spoken publicly - then the campaign
could perhaps be seen as successful.
A Savanta survey found 59% of respondents in Britain said it was a
bad idea for Harry and Meghan to air their documentary, with a half
saying they did not trust that the show would be an accurate account
of the couple's experience.
"Personally, I don't think that it will do lasting damage to the
monarchy," royal biographer Claudia Joseph said of the Netflix
documentary.
"I think that people that are royalists will still be royalists and
will see this as Meghan and Harry again throwing their toys out of
the pram, and the people that are republicans will remain
republicans and blame the royal family for the way they've treated
Harry and Meghan."
Or, as 45-year-old London local Tarek Hilal said on Thursday: "In
the long run, it just won't make a difference. Storm in a teacup."
(Additional reporting by Hanna Rantala and Marie-Louise Gumuchian,
Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|