The
ruling by the Appellate Division in Manhattan marked the latest
setback for the university in its fight to avoid recognizing Y.U.
Pride Alliance in a case that conservative U.S. Supreme Court
justices have signaled interest in reviewing.
The court upheld a judge's ruling that the school did not
qualify as a "religious corporation," which would exempt it from
prohibitions against discrimination by a place or provider of
public accommodation under the New York City Human Rights Law.
That law bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation,
religion, race, gender, age, national origin and some other
factors.
The unanimous four-judge panel also said requiring Yeshiva to
recognize the club did not violate its rights under the U.S.
Constitution's First Amendment to the free exercise of religion,
saying the law was "neutral and generally applicable."
Katie Rosenfeld, a lawyer for Y.U. Pride Alliance, in a
statement said the ruling affirmed that the school "cannot
discriminate against its LGBTQ+ students by continuing its
refusal to recognize the YU Pride Alliance."
Yeshiva, a Modern Orthodox Jewish university based in Manhattan,
in a statement said it would "continue on appeal to defend
against the claim that we are not a religious institution."
YU Pride Alliance agreed in September to hold off on forcing
Yeshiva to recognize it while the school pursued its appeals
after the school briefly halted all student club activities.
It did so after the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision earlier
that month declined to block the New York judge's June ruling
requiring it to recognize the club.
Four conservative justices dissented including Justice Samuel
Alito, who said Yeshiva's First Amendment rights appeared to be
violated and that the court would likely take the case up if
Yeshiva lost its lower-court appeals.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Stephen Coates)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|