Judge to determine what happens next with Illinois' SAFE-T Act
Send a link to a friend
[December 21, 2022]
By Andrew Hensel | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – The state's controversial SAFE-T Act is set to end
cash bail for many crimes in Illinois Jan. 1. Tuesday, a Kankakee County
judge heard arguments in a lawsuit challenging the measure.
The case was a combined lawsuit involving over 60 state's attorneys from
around Illinois. Judge Thomas Cunningham was the presiding judge.
The Safety, Accountability, Fairness, and Equity Today, or SAFE-T, Act,
was approved by the General Assembly in January 2021. It makes several
changes to the criminal justice system in the state, including
eliminating cash bail statewide, making it the first state to do so.
Kankakee County State's Attorney Jim Rowe argued the SAFE-T Act is
unconstitutional because it violates the state's single-subject law,
which confines legislation to only one subject. In addition, he argued
that the whole measure is invalid because a provision related to
redistricting maps is included.
Darren Kinkead, who argued on behalf of the state, claimed the measure
does not violate any single-subject laws because the redistricting is
about prisoners and would be included as a part of the criminal justice
system.
Rowe also said the SAFE-T Act is a product of "legal logrolling," a
practice he said adds unpopular provisions into a measure with popular
provisions. Rowe also said the state tried to sneak the bill past the
legislature by presenting it at 3 in the morning.
Final arguments focused on the elimination of cash bail in Illinois.
Rowe claimed that the constitution gives judges the power to enforce
monetary bail. He said the state is violating the constitution by
getting rid of that power.
[to top of second column]
|
The Kankakee County Courthouse in
Kankakee, Illinois - Andrew Hensel / The Center Square
Rowe said that when reviewing the trailer bill that passed earlier this
month after November's midterm election, it shows that proponents were
dishonest about the contents of the measure heading into the November
election. The trailer bill amended various provisions of the original
measure, including specifying for which crimes people can be held for
pretrial.
"They said [Will County State's Attorney Jim Glasgow] is a fearmongerer,
that [Kankakee County Sherriff Mike Downey] is a fearmongerer, that I am
a fearmongerer," Rowe argued in court. "We were telling the truth, and
how does the court know that? Because in these 300 pages they just
passed in the trailer bill, they fixed all of that. That's how they won
their election, by lying."
Glasgow, who sued Gov. J.B. Pritzker over the SAFE-T Act, sat alongside
Rowe on Tuesday. Glasgow said he is pleased with how things played out.
"I felt the hearing went very well today. I think the judge took
everything in, and now we just wait for his decision," Glasgow told The
Center Square.
The judge said he would render a decision in this case by Dec. 28, just
days before no-cash bail takes effect.
Andrew Hensel has years of experience as a reporter and
pre-game host for the Joliet Slammers, and as a producer for the Windy
City Bulls. A graduate of Iowa Wesleyan University and Illinois Media
School, Andrew lives in the south suburbs of Chicago.
|