U.S. safety experts dispute aspects of Ethiopia 737-MAX air crash
findings
Send a link to a friend
[December 28, 2022]
NAIROBI (Reuters) - U.S. air safety experts say Ethiopian
inspectors investigating the cause of an Ethiopian Airlines' crash that
killed nearly 160 people in 2019 did not pay enough attention to crew
training and emergency procedures in their report.
The United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in
dissenting comments included in the Ethiopian report, disagreed with at
least two key findings of the investigation into the crash of a Boeing
737-MAX flight.
The accident led to the grounding of similar jets. The NTSB is involved
as Boeing is a U.S. company.
Fight 302 crashed shortly after take-off from Addis Ababa in March 2019,
killing all 157 people on board.
Ethiopia's Aircraft Investigation Bureau released its long-delayed
report last Friday. It blamed the accident on "uncommanded" inputs from
Boeing's Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System, known as MCAS.
The inputs, which were caused by faulty data from an underlying sensor,
sent the plane's nose down repeatedly, leading to loss of control as the
pilots tried to deal with several warnings in the cabin, the report
said.
But in its comments, the NTSB said it found the faulty sensor may have
been damaged by a bird strike soon after take-off, an assertion that was
ignored by the Ethiopian investigators.
The Ethiopians did not find any evidence that the sensor was damaged in
flight due to lack of any physical clues like a dead bird in the
vicinity of the flight's path, their report said.
The NTSB, however, said the sensor was never recovered at the crash site
in spite of a partial search by both sides a week after the accident.
Boeing has previously said the MCAS was a safety feature and the issues
identified after the crash of flight 302, which followed one of a
similar plane in Indonesia five months earlier, have been rectified.
[to top of second column]
|
The NTSB also accused their Ethiopian counterparts of focusing on
the contributions of the design issues to the accident at the
expense of the crew's own training and reaction to the emergency
that arose.
"Discussion of crew resource management and performance were still
not sufficiently developed in the draft final report," the NTSB
said.
The pilots were supposed to manually reduce throttle after the
erroneous feeds from the sensor interfered with the expected
automatic sequence, it said.
In their report, the Ethiopian investigators found that the crew
members were licensed and qualified for flight in accordance with
the existing Ethiopian Civil Aviation Rules and Standards, but were
startled by the unprecedented change of events and "confusing
alerts", and blamed it all on the plane's design.
"Flight crew situational awareness and ability to perceive each and
every thing to the detail was greatly affected with the ever
changing flight scenario and unsettling warnings and flight deck
effects," the report said.
The investigation bureau referred Reuters to NTSB's statement when
asked for further comments.
The accident involving Flight 302 followed another incident five
months earlier, when the same model crashed in Indonesia, killing
189 people.
The accidents exposed a problem with a system on the plane, and the
model was grounded worldwide, costing Boeing some $20 billion and
prompting court cases that exposed shortcomings with the
certification process.
Operators have since resumed flying the 737-MAX after the plane's
20-month grounding. Ethiopia was among the last countries to return
the 737 MAX to service.
(Reporting by Nairobi Newsroom; Additional reporting by David
Shepardson in Washington; Writing by Duncan Miriri; Editing by James
Macharia Chege and Angus MacSwan)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |