Congressional report: U.S. FDA broke own protocols in approving Biogen
Alzheimer's drug
Send a link to a friend
[December 30, 2022]
By Ahmed Aboulenein
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration failed to
adhere to its own guidance and internal practices during the approval
process for Biogen's Alzheimer's drug Aduhelm, which was "rife with
irregularities," a congressional report showed on Thursday.
The FDA's interactions with Biogen were "atypical" and did not follow
the agency's documentation protocol, according to a staff report on the
findings of an 18-month investigation conducted by two House of
Representatives committees into the drug's regulatory review, approval,
pricing, and marketing.
The FDA approved Aduhelm in June 2021 under an accelerated approval
pathway over the objections of its panel of outside advisers, who did
not believe data definitively proved the drug's benefit to patients.
It was authorized based on evidence that it could reduce brain plaques,
a likely contributor to Alzheimer's, rather than proof that it slowed
progression of the lethal mind-wasting disease.
The Medicare program restricted its coverage, which has led to severely
limited use of the Biogen drug.
Biogen set an "unjustifiably high" price by initially setting Aduhelm's
price at $56,000 per year despite a lack of demonstrated clinical
benefit in a broad patient population, the report said, adding that the
company's own internal projections showed it expected the drug to be a
burden to Medicare and costly to patients.
"The findings in this report raise serious concerns about FDA's lapses
in protocol and Biogen's disregard of efficacy and access in the
approval process for Aduhelm," the report, prepared by the staffs of the
House Committee on Oversight and Reform and House Committee on Energy
and Commerce, concluded.
The agency should ensure that all substantive interactions with drug
sponsors are properly memorialized, establish a protocol for joint
briefing documents with drug sponsors, and update its industry guidance
on the developments and review of new Alzheimer's Drugs, the report
recommended.
Biogen and other drugmakers should communicate to the FDA any concerns
over safety and efficacy to the FDA as well as take value and patient
access into consideration when setting prices, the report said.
An FDA spokesperson said the FDA's decision to approve Aduhelm was based
on scientific evaluation of the data contained in the application.
He pointed to the FDA's internal review finding its staff's interactions
with Biogen appropriate.
"It is the agency’s job to frequently interact with companies in order
to ensure that we have adequate information to inform our regulatory
decision-making. We will continue to do so, as it is in the best
interest of patients," he said, adding that the agency will continue to
use the accelerated approval pathway whenever appropriate.
[to top of second column]
|
A sign marks a Biogen facility in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., March 9, 2020. REUTERS/Brian
Snyder/File Photo
The FDA has already begun
implementing some of the report’s recommendations, the spokesperson
said.
"Biogen stands by the integrity of the actions we have taken," the
Cambridge, Mass.-based biotech company said in an emailed statement.
"As stated in the congressional report, an (FDA)
review concluded that, 'There is no evidence that these interactions
with the sponsor in advance of filing were anything but appropriate
in this situation,'" Biogen said.
Documents obtained by the committees show that FDA staff and Biogen
held at least 115 meetings, calls, and email exchanges over a
12-month period starting July 2019.
The total number of meetings is unknown because the FDA failed to
keep a clear record of informal meetings and interactions between
its staff and Biogen representatives. The investigation identified
an additional 66 calls and email exchanges that were not
memorialized.
The FDA inappropriately collaborated with Biogen on a joint briefing
document for the Peripheral and Central Nervous System (PCNS)
Advisory Committee, the report said, with FDA and Biogen staff
working closely for months ahead of the Nov. 6, 2020 meeting to
prepare the document, which failed to adequately represent differing
views within the agency.
"Using a joint briefing document afforded Biogen advance insight
into FDA's responses and direct guidance from the agency in drafting
the company's own sections. For example, in an exchange of the draft
briefing document on October 9, 2020, FDA staff asked Biogen to move
a paragraph drafted by the agency into Biogen's section of the
memorandum—a change reflected when the document was finalized," the
report made public to media organizations said.
When none of the advisory panel members voted to approve Aduhelm,
the FDA pivoted to using its accelerated approval pathway -
typically used for rare diseases or small patient populations that
lack access to effective treatments - despite having considered the
drug under the traditional approval pathway for nine months, the
report said.
It did so on a substantially abbreviated timeline, approving it
after three weeks of review, and for a broad label indication of
"people with Alzheimer's disease" that was unsupported by clinical
data, the report said.
Internal documents obtained by the investigation showed that Biogen
accepted the indication despite its own reservations over the lack
of evidence Aduhelm could help patients at disease stages outside of
its clinical trials.
(Reporting by Ahmed Aboulenein; editing by Diane Craft)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |