Sarah Palin, New York Times clash at trial testing defamation protection
for media
Send a link to a friend
[February 04, 2022]
By Jody Godoy and Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sarah Palin, the
former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican U.S. vice presidential
candidate, went to trial against the New York Times on Thursday, in a
highly anticipated defamation case that could test long-standing
protections for American news media.
Palin, 57, is suing over a 2017 editorial that incorrectly linked her
political rhetoric to a 2011 Arizona mass shooting that left six dead
and U.S. Representative Gabby Giffords seriously wounded, and which the
newspaper later corrected.
In his opening statement, Palin's lawyer Shane Vogt told jurors that his
client was fighting an "uphill battle" to show the editorial reflected
the Times' knowledge it was false and its "history of bias" toward her
and other Republicans.
The Times' lawyer, David Axelrod, countered in his opening statement
that the editorial sought to hold both Democrats and Republicans
responsible for inflammatory rhetoric, and said the newspaper acted "as
quickly as possible" to correct its mistake.
The trial in federal court in Manhattan could become a test of the U.S.
Supreme Court's landmark 1964 decision in New York Times v. Sullivan,
which made it difficult for public figures like Palin to prove
defamation.
To win, Palin must offer clear and convincing evidence the Times acted
with "actual malice," meaning it knew the editorial was false or had
reckless disregard for the truth. She is seeking unspecified damages for
alleged harm to her reputation.
Two conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices and some legal scholars
have suggested revisiting the Sullivan decision, and Palin has signaled
she would challenge it on appeal if she lost.
"What am I trying to accomplish? Justice, for people who expect the
truth in the media," Palin told reporters as she entered the courthouse.
Headlined "America's Lethal Politics," the disputed June 14, 2017,
editorial was published after a shooting in Alexandria, Virginia in
which Steve Scalise, a member of the House of Representatives'
Republican leadership, was wounded.
The editorial questioned whether the shooting reflected how vicious
American politics had become.
It then said "the link to political incitement was clear" when Jared Lee
Loughner opened fire in the 2011 shooting after Palin's political action
committee had circulated a map putting Gifford and 19 other Democrats
under "stylized cross hairs."
Former editorial page editor James Bennet, who is also a defendant, had
added the disputed wording to a draft prepared by Elizabeth Williamson,
a colleague on the Times editorial board.
"The key will be showing how the editorial came together," said Timothy
Zick, a professor and First Amendment specialist at William & Mary Law
School. "Essentially, did the Times do its homework before publishing?"
[to top of second column]
|
Sarah Palin, 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate and former
Alaska governor, arrives for the trial in her defamation lawsuit
against the New York Times, at the United States Courthouse in the
Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., February 3, 2022.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
COVID DELAY
Palin's lawyer Vogt said "we are not here trying to win your votes
for Governor Palin or any of her policies," but instead wanted the
Times found liable for a "particularly horrific and debunked"
editorial.
He portrayed Bennet as a "highly educated career journalist" who
knew the words he added were false, yet did not change them.
"He had his narrative, and he stuck to it," Vogt said.
But Axelrod said Bennet did not intend to suggest that Loughner
acted because of Palin, or that readers infer a link, and that
Bennet would testify about "exactly what he meant."
Axelrod also said no one at the Times harbored ill will toward Palin,
and the dispute concerned a mere two sentences in a 12-paragraph
editorial.
"The editorial was not even about her," he said.
Williamson, who still works at the Times, was the trial's first
witness.
She said Bennet would have been responsible for fact-checking
passages he added, and that she had been unaware of any link between
the Virginia shooting and political rhetoric.
Williamson was asked to discuss an email Bennet sent before the
editorial, where he asked whether hate speech played a role and
suggested it might have before the Giffords shooting.
The trial was delayed from Jan. 24 because Palin tested positive for
the coronavirus.
Palin has publicly said she will not get the COVID-19 vaccine. She
wore a black mask in the courtroom.
The Times has not suffered a loss in a defamation case in more than
half a century.
In calling for Sullivan to be revisited, Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas has said little historical evidence suggested the
actual malice standard flowed from the original meaning of the U.S.
Constitution's First and 14th Amendments.
Another justice, Neil Gorsuch, has said the standard offered an
"ironclad subsidy for the publication of falsehoods" by a growing
number of media that can disseminate sensational information with
little regard for the truth.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Jody Godoy in New York;
Additional reporting by Luc Cohen, Andrew Hofstetter and Hussein
Waaile; editing by Grant McCool, Jonathan Oatis and Will Dunham)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |