State, opponents urge court ruling on school mandates despite JCAR vote
Send a link to a friend
[February 17, 2022]
by
PETER HANCOCK
Capitol News Illinois
phancock@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – The question of whether K-12
schools in Illinois can continue to enforce mask mandates and other
COVID-19 mitigations remained unclear Wednesday as all three branches of
state government tried to grapple with it.
Gov. JB Pritzker said Wednesday that his executive order requiring those
measures remains in place, at least in districts not named in a pending
lawsuit even though a legislative panel voted Tuesday not to renew a set
of emergency rules that were meant to implement that executive order.
Meanwhile, the 4th District Court of Appeals in Springfield asked
attorneys in the lawsuit to explain how the vote by the Joint Committee
on Administrative Rules affects that lawsuit and whether the court still
needs to review a temporary restraining order pertaining to the
mandates.
That order was issued by a Sangamon County judge earlier in the month,
blocking enforcement of the mandates in the roughly 170 school districts
involved in the case.
“As I've said, the ruling by the Sangamon County judge created an
enormous amount of confusion, which is why we've asked the appellate
court to move quickly to respond,” Pritzker said at a news conference
Wednesday. “The executive order requiring masks is still in place.
School districts that aren't part of the lawsuit should follow the
executive order.”
At the center of the confusion are a set of lawsuits filed by parents
and students in about 170 school districts across the state challenging
the mitigation mandates.
Beginning last fall, Pritzker issued a series of executive orders
requiring face masks to be worn in school buildings, that school staff
be fully vaccinated or submit to regular testing, and that schools
exclude from their buildings any student or employee who had a confirmed
or probable case of COVID-19 or who had been in close contact with
someone else with a confirmed or probable case.
In addition, the Illinois Department of Public Health issued a set of
emergency rules to implement that executive order.
[to top of second column]
|
Gov. JB Pritzker is pictured wearing a face covering
at a news conference in Springfield in 2020. (Capitol News Illinois
file photo)
The cases were eventually consolidated and assigned to the Sangamon
County Circuit Court where, on Feb. 4, Judge Raylene Grischow granted
the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order blocking
enforcement of the mandates until the case is decided on its merits.
That decision is now on appeal before the 4th District Court of Appeals.
Currently, the restraining order applies only to the districts named in
the lawsuits.
The emergency rules that IDPH issued last fall expired on Sunday, Feb.
13. As a result, the agency reissued those rules on Monday. But the
General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Administrative Rules voted Tuesday
to object and suspend those rules, citing the temporary restraining
order and the confusion over which school systems the rules would apply
to.
Later Tuesday, the 4th District Court of Appeals issued an order
directing attorneys in the cases to explain how the JCAR vote affected
the appeal.
On Wednesday, attorneys on both sides indicated that the appeal should
go forward.
“Because JCAR’s action related only to the IDPH renewed Emergency Rule,
it does not affect the (executive orders),” Attorney General Kwame
Raoul’s office wrote in its brief. “The validity, legality, and
enforceability of the EOs continues to present a live case or
controversy.”
William Gerber, an attorney for the plaintiffs, made a similar argument,
that JCAR’s decision only affected the emergency rules, not the
underlying executive orders, which schools continue to rely on to
enforce the mitigation mandates.
“The JCAR ruling was only directed at the IDPH and did not appear to be
directed specifically at local schools,” he wrote. “As such, under an
abuse of discretion analysis, the appellate court may still answer the
question of whether plaintiffs had shown a likelihood of success that
local school districts lacked authority to mandate masking, testing, and
vaccinations because the (Illinois Department of Public Health Act),
rather than the Illinois School Code, applied to the issues at hand.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering
state government and distributed to more than 400 newspapers statewide.
It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert
R. McCormick Foundation |