The mediator, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Shelley Chapman, has been
overseeing talks between Sackler family members and eight states and
the District of Columbia. U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in
December blocked an earlier $4.33 billion proposed settlement that
would have legally shielded the family members, a decision that
threatened to upend Purdue's bankruptcy reorganization.
The Sackler family members are trying to win support for a new
settlement that could allow Stamford, Connecticut-based Purdue to
emerge from bankruptcy.
The proposed framework would add at least $1.175 billion in cash,
plus up to $500 million in proceeds from the sale of other companies
owned by the family members, according to the mediator. While the
agreement is not final, the mediator revealed the framework under
discussion for the first time on Friday.
All of the funds would be directed toward abatement of the opioid
crisis, including support and services for survivors, victims and
their families, according to Chapman.
"We remain focused on achieving our goal of providing urgently
needed funds to the American people for opioid crisis abatement,"
Purdue said a statement. "We believe a global settlement is the
swiftest and most cost-effective exit path from Chapter 11 and we
will continue working to build consensus."
Not all of the states have agreed to the deal, and Chapman asked for
permission from U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain, who is
overseeing the Purdue case, to continue negotiations until Feb 28.
That date would fall close to the March 3 expiration of legal
protections that prevent the Sacklers from being sued while Purdue
remains in bankruptcy.
[to top of second column] |
Purdue, maker of the highly addictive OxyContin
opioid pain drug, filed for bankruptcy in 2019
in the face of thousands of lawsuits accusing it
and Sackler family members of fueling the opioid
epidemic through deceptive marketing.
The company pleaded guilty to misbranding and
fraud charges related to its marketing of
OxyContin in 2007 and 2020. Sackler family
members have denied wrongdoing.
McMahon ruled in December that the bankruptcy
court lacked the authority to approve sweeping
legal protections to shield the Sacklers from
the opioid lawsuits.
Purdue and Sackler family members have appealed
McMahon's decision to the New York-based 2nd
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking to
reinstate legal protections for the family
members. Oral arguments in that appeal are
scheduled for April 25.
The size of the Sackler contribution was a
source of controversy throughout Purdue's
bankruptcy case. Sackler family members took out
more than $10 billion from the company in the
decade before it filed for bankruptcy, and they
had a net worth of $14 billion in 2015,
according to McMahon's decision.
The bankruptcy court also evaluated the Sacklers'
withdrawals from the company, but it concluded
that there were legal and practical hurdles that
made it difficult to recoup anything close to
the $10 billion withdrawn.
(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware;
Editing by Will Dunham, Nick Zieminski and
Alistair Bell)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |