U.S. Supreme Court to hear 'remain in Mexico' immigration dispute
Send a link to a friend
[February 19, 2022]
By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday
agreed to hear President Joe Biden's bid to rescind a hardline
immigration policy begun under his predecessor Donald Trump that forced
tens of thousands of migrants to stay in Mexico to await U.S. hearings
on their asylum claims.
The justices will hear a Biden administration appeal of a lower court
ruling that reinstated the so-called "remain in Mexico" policy after the
Republican-led states of Texas and Missouri had sued to maintain the
program. Biden suspended the policy, which changed longstanding U.S.
practice, shortly after taking office last year.
The Supreme Court fast-tracked the case so it can be argued during its
current term in April, with a ruling expected by the end of June.
Trump's administration said what it called a security and humanitarian
crisis along the U.S.-Mexican border justified refusing to allow
migrants seeking asylum, because of a fear of persecution in their home
countries, to enter the United States ahead of hearings before
immigration judges. The policy is formally called the Migrant Protection
Protocols (MPP).
Prior administrations had used the federal immigration provision at
issue in the case, which took effect in 1997, on a limited basis, court
papers said.
The Biden administration said the provision is clearly discretionary and
that the lower court's decision means that every presidential
administration "has been in continuous and systematic violation" of the
law since it was created.
Roughly 68,000 people fell under the policy from the time it took effect
in 2019 until Biden suspended it in 2021.
Biden's fellow Democrats and immigration advocates criticized the Trump
policy, saying migrants stuck in Mexican border cities have faced
kidnappings and other dangers.
Texas and Missouri challenged the Biden administration's move to scrap
the policy, including a memo terminating the program issued last June.
[to top of second column]
|
The U.S. Supreme Court stands in Washington, U.S., February 6, 2022.
REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
After a federal judge reinstated the
program, the Supreme Court last August refused a Biden
administration request to block that ruling while the government
pursued an appeal.
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in December
upheld the judge's decision, ruling that Biden's action violated
both federal immigration and administrative law. The 5th Circuit
said that because the government does not have the capacity to
detain all migrants who are not eligible for admission pending a
hearing, it must maintain "remain in Mexico."
In its appeal to the Supreme Court, Biden's administration said it
is being "forced to reinstate and continue implementing indefinitely
a controversial policy" that exposes migrants to safety risks, harms
relations with Mexico and is not the best tool for deterring illegal
immigration.
The administration also said that the lower courts are unacceptably
interfering with the historically broad authority that U.S.
presidents have held over immigration and foreign affairs - a
principle that the Supreme Court has long endorsed including in
cases when Trump was president.
The number of migrants caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border has
soared to record highs recently, with Trump's fellow Republicans
criticizing Biden's immigration policies.
Biden's administration has left in place a separate Trump-era order
that lets U.S. border authorities, because of the COVID-19 public
health crisis, rapidly expel migrants caught at the border without
giving them a chance to seek asylum in the United States.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Additional reporting by Ted
Hesson; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|