Bribery case involving ComEd officials moves ahead with shadow over
Madigan
Send a link to a friend
[February 22, 2022]
By Brett Rowland
(The Center Square) – Former House Speaker
Michael Madigan spent more than $2.7 million for legal work in 2021,
most of it after he left office, after being implicated but not charged
in a federal corruption probe that continues to make waves in
Springfield.
After it became clear he didn't have the votes, Madigan withdrew his bid
in January 2021 to continue on as speaker of the Illinois House, a
position he held for nearly four decades. Shortly after, on Feb. 18,
2021, he resigned from the state legislature. The next day, his campaign
fund, Friends of Michael J Madigan, spent $2 million with Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP, a Chicago-based law firm with more than 700 attorneys
around the globe. Last year, Friends of Michael J Madigan spent
2,771,890.55 with six law firms, according to campaign finance records
from Illinois Sunshine.
The clouds around the former speaker have made it difficult to tell what
lies ahead for Madigan.
"The smoke obscures your view so there's no real clarity," said David
Parker, assistant professor at the Graham School of Management at Saint
Xavier University. "There's something there, there's something through
the mist, the fog, you just don't really know what it is."
This week, Judge Harry Leinenweber denied a motion to dismiss corruption
charges against four people who prosecutors allege gave jobs and
contracts as part of an 8-year long effort to influence Madigan on
behalf of ComEd, the state's largest electrical utility. The decision is
the latest ahead of a possible trial in September.
Leinenweber denied the motion to dismiss the key charges against Michael
McClain, a former state lawmaker and ComEd lobbyist who was one of
Madigan's closest associates; former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, former
ComEd lobbyist John Hooker and former ComEd consultant Jay Doherty. The
four had argued that prosecutors failed to allege specific quid pro quo
transactions and that they engaged in legal lobbying.
"The fact that these incentives were laundered partially through jobs
does not invalidate the indictment," Leinenweber wrote in a 25-page
decision. "A company cannot use its payroll line on its accounting
ledger to circumvent all government oversight of public corruption."
The judge said prosecutors had met their burden to proceed with the
case.
"The Court finds the government has met its burden in the indictment by
presenting particular acts that Defendants intended to reward Public
Official A," Leinenweber wrote. "Specifically, the government pointed to
the General Assembly’s passage of the Energy Infrastructure and
Modernization Act (“EIMA”) in 2011, Senate Bill 9 in 2013 (overturning
an adverse interpretation of EIMA), and the Future Energy Jobs Act in
2016, as well as ComEd’s 'continuing interest in advancing legislation
in the General Assembly favorable to its interests, and opposing
legislation that was not consistent with its operational and financial
success.' "
[to top of second column]
|
Madigan is referred to as Public Official A in the court proceedings.
"The government does not allege that every hiring decision made by ComEd
over eight years could be brought as a corrupt hiring at trial," the
judge wrote. "The only decisions alleged by the government as violating
the anticorruption laws are ones where the hiring request was made
through the former legislator defendant McClain. The government also
provided specific examples in the indictment on how the scheme worked
with respect to four hiring decisions, one law firm retention, one board
appointment, and one preferential intern program."
Parker said it's too early to tell what all this could mean for Madigan.
"He's still a target and I think there's still enough developing that
it's not going away," he said.
A message seeking comment sent to a communications firm paid by Friends
of Michael J Madigan wasn't immediately returned.
McClain, Pramaggiore, Hooker and Doherty have pleaded not guilty. The
most serious charges against the four could come with a 20-year prison
sentence.
In 2020, federal prosecutors and Exelon subsidiary ComEd reached a
deferred prosecution agreement. As part of the agreement, the utility
admitted it paid $1.3 million in jobs and contracts to associates of
Madigan over the span of nine years in an effort to influence the former
House speaker. ComEd also agreed to pay a $200 million fine. Another
former ComEd official, Fidel Marquez, pleaded guilty to bribery charges
in September 2020.
Prosecutors also indicted Tim Mapes, who served for years under Madigan
as the clerk of the Illinois House and as Madigan’s chief of staff, on a
charge of lying to a grand jury in May 2021. The indictment alleges
Mapes lied to the grand jury when asked about Madigan’s relationship
with McClain.
Also this week, AT&T revealed in a U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission filing that its subsidiary, Illinois Bell Telephone Company
LLC, "has been cooperating with the U.S. Attorney’s Office concerning
their widely reported investigation of certain elected Illinois
politicians and related parties for corruption."
The SEC filing said that the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern
District of Illinois had notified the company that it was considering
filing a charge against Illinois Bell over a 2017 consulting contract.
Eileen Mitchell, who previously worked for Madigan, is the CEO of
Illinois Bell.
"Recently, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of
Illinois informed us that they are considering filing a charge against
one of our subsidiaries, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC (Illinois
Bell), arising out of a single, nine-month consulting contract in 2017
worth $22,500," the company wrote in the filing. "Based on our own
extensive investigation of the facts and our engagement with the U.S.
Attorney's Office, we have concluded that the contract at issue was
legal in all respects and that any charge against Illinois Bell or its
personnel would be without merit." |