U.S. Supreme Court considers whether to halt Biden vaccine mandates
Send a link to a friend
[January 07, 2022]
By Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Friday is set to consider requests by Republican state
officials and business groups to block President Joe Biden's vaccine
mandate for employers with more than 100 workers and a similar
requirement for healthcare facilities at a time of surging COVID-19
cases nationwide.
The nine justices are scheduled to hear at least two hours of arguments
beginning at 10 a.m. EST (1500 GMT) in two cases that present a test of
presidential powers to combat a public health crisis that has left more
than 830,000 Americans dead.
The White House has said the two temporary mandates will save lives and
strengthen the U.S. economy by increasing the number of vaccinated
Americans by the millions.
The challengers have argued that the federal government exceeded its
authority by imposing requirements not specifically authorized by
Congress and failed to follow the proper administrative processes for
issuing emergency regulations.
The court's 6-3 conservative majority in the past has shown skepticism
toward sweeping actions by federal agencies.
Under one of the policies, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) required that workers at businesses with 100 or
more employees be vaccinated or tested weekly, a policy applying to more
than 80 million workers nationwide.
The state of Ohio and the National Federation of Independent Business
are taking the lead in seeking to block that mandate. Religious groups
including the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary are among those also
challenging the policy in separate cases.
Under the second policy under review by the Supreme Court, vaccination
is required for an estimated 10.3 million workers at about 76,000
healthcare facilities, including hospitals and nursing homes, that
participate in the Medicare and Medicaid government health insurance
programs for elderly, disabled and low-income Americans.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency
responsible for administering the two programs, issued the rule. The
states of Missouri and Louisiana are taking the lead in the arguments
before the justices seeking an order blocking it.
[to top of second column]
|
A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington,
U.S. October 13, 2021. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
The Supreme Court has dealt with
several pandemic-related cases already and rejected religious-based
challenges to state vaccine requirements. Friday's cases for the
first time test the federal government's authority to issue vaccine
mandates.
The court in other pandemic-related cases has backed religious
challenges to certain restrictions and ended the federal
government's residential eviction moratorium, originally imposed
under former President Donald Trump.
As in many countries, vaccination has become a divisive issue in the
United States, with some people adamantly opposed and many
Republicans critical of mandates imposed by governments and
businesses. The United States and countries around the world are
facing an upswing in COVID-19 cases driven by the Omicron
coronavirus variant.
Biden's administration is asking the justices to lift orders by
federal judges in Missouri and Louisiana blocking the healthcare
worker mandate in half the 50 states while litigation on the legal
merits of the policy continues.
The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 17
lifted an injunction issued by another court that had blocked the
OSHA rule regarding large businesses, prompting challengers to ask
the Supreme Court to intervene.
Biden's administration is arguing that Congress gave federal
agencies broad leeway to require employers to protect workers and
Medicare and Medicaid patients from health and safety hazards.
Decisions in both cases are expected quickly, with the
administration's deadlines for compliance looming.
The nine justices spent most of the pandemic working remotely but
returned to in-person arguments in October. All nine are fully
vaccinated, the court said.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung; Editing by Will
Dunham)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |