Small children getting less sick from Omicron; Genetic mutation protects
against severe COVID
Send a link to a friend
[January 22, 2022]
By Nancy Lapid
(Reuters) - The following is a summary of
some recent studies on COVID-19. They include research that warrants
further study to corroborate the findings and that has yet to be
certified by peer review.
Small children are getting less sick from Omicron
In very young children, the Omicron variant of the coronavirus causes
less severe disease than the Delta variant, according to a new study.
Researchers reviewed data on nearly 80,000 U.S. children under age 5
with a first infection, including 7,201 infected in late December or
early January when Omicron was causing more than 90% of cases. After
accounting for other risk factors, including medical conditions and
socioeconomic circumstances, researchers found children infected during
the Omicron surge had a 29% lower risk of emergency department visits, a
67% lower risk of hospitalization, a 68% lower risk of needing intensive
care, and a 71% lower risk of needing machines to breathe, compared to
children infected with Delta. However, "because of Omicron's increased
transmissibility, the overall number of emergency department visits,
hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and mechanical ventilator use in
children may still be greater" with Omicron than with Delta, according
to a report posted on medRxiv ahead of peer review.
The investigators have also observed that infection rates were
disproportionately higher in Black and Hispanic children for both
Omicron and Delta for this age group, and the gap widened for infections
with Omicron, said study leader Rong Xu of Case Western Reserve
University School of Medicine. Not yet published data shows that
"children under 5 had the highest infection rate with Omicron" compared
to older children and adults in all age groups, she said.
Genetic mutation protects against severe COVID-19
New findings add to evidence that people with a certain version of a
gene are less likely to develop severe COVID-19.
Earlier research had identified a specific group of genes, called the
OAS1/2/3 gene cluster, as being involved in the risk for severe
COVID-19. One version of a gene in that cluster - passed down from
Neanderthals - appeared to protect against severe disease, reducing the
risk by about 23%. The earlier research was done mainly in people of
European ancestry. According to a report published in Nature Genetics,
researchers now see the same association of this genetic variant with
less severe COVID-19 in people of African ancestry.
[to top of second column]
|
A child is seen near a syringe containing a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine at Smoketown Family Wellness
Center in Louisville, Kentucky, U.S., November 8, 2021. REUTERS/Jon
Cherry
"The fact that individuals of African descent had the same protection
allowed us to identify the unique variant in the DNA that actually
protects from COVID-19 infection," coauthor Dr. Jennifer Huffman of said
in a statement. OAS genes are involved in a cascade of effects that help
cells fight viruses, the researchers said. Understanding of these genes
and their effect on COVID-19 risks could aid development of future
drugs, they added.
Fewer Delta breakthroughs with Moderna vs Pfizer/BioNTech
When the Delta variant of the coronavirus was prevalent in the United
States, recipients of two doses of Moderna's mRNA vaccine were less
likely to experience a breakthrough infection - and if they did, were
slightly less likely to be hospitalized - than recipients of two doses
of the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer and BioNTech, a large study found.
Researchers analyzed health records of more than 637,000 vaccine
recipients who were not previously infected with the virus and had not
gotten a booster shot. As reported on Thursday in JAMA, breakthrough
infections steadily increased every month from July to November 2021,
with higher rates in the Pfizer/BioNTech group. In November, there were
2.8 cases among every thousand people vaccinated with the Pfizer/BioNTech
shots, compared to 1.6 cases per thousand recipients of the Moderna
vaccines. The vaccines protected equally well against death, but the
hospitalization rate was 12.7% for infected Moderna recipients and 13.3%
for Pfizer/BioNTech recipients. When the researchers compared 62,584
Moderna recipients to a closely-matched equal-sized group of Pfizer/BioNTech
recipients, the risk for breakthrough infection was 15% lower in the
Moderna group.
"Although there is a difference in breakthrough infections, both
vaccines are highly protective against SARS-COV2 infection and
especially against the most severe consequences of infection," said
coauthor Pamela Davis of Case Western Reserve University School of
Medicine in a statement.
Click for a Reuters graphic on vaccines in development.
(Reporting by Nancy Lapid; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |