Exclusive-Hong Kong leader delays filling post, raising questions about
judiciary's independence
Send a link to a friend
[January 31, 2022]
By Greg Torode
HONG KONG (Reuters) - Hong Kong's leader
has left open for more than five months a seat on the panel that selects
the city's judges, three lawyers familiar with the situation said.
The unprecedented delay raises questions over the autonomy of the city's
judiciary, these lawyers and nine diplomats and scholars told Reuters.
Nomination of judges by the Judicial Officers' Recommendation Commission
is increasingly important as some of these jurists will rule on issues
such as prosecutions under a controversial national security law that
Beijing imposed on the city in 2020 to punish subversion, terrorism,
secession and collusion with foreign forces.
Lam has delayed the decision to act on the nomination of British-trained
trial lawyer Neville Sarony, who is in his early 80s, to the seat
reserved for a barrister on the commission.
Sarony has in recent newspaper columns criticised Hong Kong government
policies, voicing support for free speech and some pro-democracy lawyer
activists. He declined to comment on his nomination.
Reuters could not determine the reasons for the delay.
A Lam spokesman said the “appointment of (a) member” to the panel was
being processed by the government and would be announced in due course.
The spokesman did not respond to questions over why the decision on
Sarony had been delayed or whether Lam would reject him outright and
seek a new name from Hong Kong's Bar Association.
Pro-Beijing media and some Chinese officials have branded the
barristers' association as "anti-China" for its criticisms of government
moves such as a 2019 proposal to allow suspects to be extradited to
mainland China for trial.
The absence has removed the voice of barristers from the panel, whose
other seats go to judges, a solicitor, the city's justice secretary and
three others not involved in the practice of law.
In Hong Kong and some other common law jurisdictions, the legal
profession is split between barristers, who are courtroom advocates, and
solicitors, who mostly handle other legal issues.
"Without a barrister, the set-up of the commission looks skewed in
favour of the establishment," said a legal scholar who has monitored the
committee for several years. "Barristers can provide an important
independent voice, particularly when the prosecution side is represented
through the secretary for justice."
City leaders have previously acted within weeks to fill vacancies on the
nine-member commission. Over the past decade, public records show,
appointments to the panel have been made before the predecessor's
resignation takes effect. Lawyers say this highlights the routine nature
of the process.
The selection "is usually a mere formality but this time there is
silence, and this strange delay," said one lawyer familiar with the
situation. Another said Lam "appears to be waiting for a new team at the
Bar to come up with a new, more acceptable name."
By delaying the decision on the barrister's nomination, Lam is using her
influence over the commission in a way not seen before and that
strengthens the hand of pro-government figures on the panel, said the
diplomats, lawyers and scholars.
The lawyers and scholars say they are not aware of a previous instance
when Hong Kong's chief executive did not promptly accept the
recommendations of the Bar Association or the Law Society, the
solicitors' association.
[to top of second column]
|
Hong Kong's Chief Executive Carrie Lam holds a news conference in
Hong Kong, China, August 25, 2020. REUTERS/Lam Yik/File Photo
They say they fear the situation
could further threaten the social and commercial freedoms the
financial hub was guaranteed when Britain handed its former colony
back to China in 1997.
COLONIAL LEGACY
The panel, created in 1976, has operated in its current form since
1991, under British and Chinese rule. It reports to the chief
executive.
The Bar Association's new chairman, Victor Dawes, did not respond to
Reuters requests for comment on Sarony's nomination. Dawes said
after his election on Jan. 20 that his team would defend the rule of
law and speak out on human rights issues if necessary.
In response to Reuters questions to the commission's chair, Chief
Justice Andrew Cheung, a Judiciary spokesman said the city's chief
executive has the power to appoint members to the committee,
including a barrister of her choice, although she must "consult" the
Bar Association on the matter.
The spokesman said there was no question of the committee "acting
other than independently", in line with the independence guaranteed
by the Basic Law, Hong Kong's mini-constitution.
The commission is one of many British-era legal legacies written
into the Basic Law, which scholars and lawyers say underscore the
importance of keeping Hong Kong's common law system secure under
Chinese rule.
Hong Kong elects a chief executive in March. Lam has not said
whether she intends to seek re-election.
The panel's deliberations are secret. It is a crime to divulge or
attempt to interfere in them.
The committee made 45 judicial nominations in 2020 that "were
accepted by the chief executive", according to the committee's most
recent annual report. It was not clear whether any were rejected.
Sarony was tapped by the Bar Association to replace veteran human
rights barrister Philip Dykes, a former bar chairman, who resigned
on Aug. 5 before the end of his term.
Dykes said he was unable to comment on his resignation.
Sarony, one of the city's most senior barristers, has handled a wide
variety of cases in Hong Kong since 1985 and is known for his
personal injury work. He is not considered by his peers to be a
partisan political figure or, like some other barristers, viewed as
an activist lawyer.
He also writes columns for the Hong Kong Economic Journal. Recent
pieces have included criticism of the Hong Kong government over its
changes to legal aid and its COVID-19 quarantine policies. Some have
also criticised the actions of the British government.
In April he expressed support for barrister and former democratic
legislator Margaret Ng after her April 16 conviction for illegal
assembly. She received a 12-month sentence, suspended for 24 months.
"I have very little respect for politicians of any persuasion, but
Margaret is that rara avis, a dedicated, honest and committed
representative of the people of Hong Kong," Sarony wrote.
(Reporting By Greg Torode; Additional reporting by Jessie Pang;
Editing by William Mallard)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |