Alabama cites Supreme Court abortion decision in transgender youth case
Send a link to a friend
[July 01, 2022]
By Steve Gorman
(Reuters) - Just days after the U.S.
Supreme Court abolished women's constitutional right to abortion,
Alabama has cited that ruling in a bid to outlaw parents from obtaining
puberty blockers and certain other medical treatment for their
transgender children.
The citation came in an appeal by Alabama's attorney general seeking to
lift a federal court injunction that partially blocked enforcement of a
newly enacted state ban on medical interventions for youth whose gender
identity is at odds with their birth sex.
The appeal is believed to mark the first time a state has expressly
invoked the recent Supreme Court opinion overturning its 1973 Roe v.
Wade decision legalizing abortion and applied the same reasoning to a
separate issue bearing on other rights.
Echoing the high court's language in striking down Roe, the Alabama
appeal filed on Monday argued that the state has the authority to outlaw
puberty-blocking hormones and other therapies for transgender minors in
part because they are not "deeply rooted in our history or traditions."
The appeal also asserted that such treatments are dangerous and
experimental, contrary to broad agreement among mainstream medical and
mental health professionals that such gender-affirming care saves lives
by reducing the risk of depression and suicide.
Last Friday's 5-4 decision from the Supreme Court's conservative
majority immediately paved the way for numerous states to enact measures
erasing or restricting a woman's ability to terminate her own pregnancy.
But civil liberties advocates have also worried that the latest abortion
ruling, in a Mississippi case titled Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health
Organization, would invite attempts by Republican-controlled
legislatures to take aim at other rights that conservatives oppose.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said
nothing in the Dobbs decision should "cast doubt on precedents that do
not concern abortion."
However, Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, urged the
court to reconsider past rulings protecting the right to contraception,
legalizing gay marriage nationwide and invalidating state laws banning
gay sex.
[to top of second column]
|
A view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., March
4, 2022. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo
CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION
The Alabama appeal seeking to restore its law barring parents for
providing gender-transitioning medical care to their children
appeared intended to draw just such a review, according to LGBTQ
rights proponents.
"This is the first case, to our knowledge, in which a state has
invoked Dobbs to attack another fundamental right," Shannon Minter,
legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said in an
email to Reuters on Thursday.
Still, Minter said Alabama's strategy was "unlikely
to gain much traction because the majority opinion was so clear that
its holding was restricted to the right to abortion."
Alito sought to distinguish abortion from other established rights
because of its implication for terminating what the Roe ruling
termed "potential life." But many legal scholars have noted that
Dobbs calls into question the constitutional foundation for other
rights later recognized by the court.
The Alabama law, passed by a Republican-dominated legislature, was
blocked from enforcement in May, less than a week after it went into
effect, in a preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge
Liles Burke, an appointee of former Republican President Donald
Trump.
Burke held that higher court rulings made clear that parents have a
right to direct the medical care of their children if it meets
acceptable standards and that transgender people are protected
against discrimination under federal law.
Burke left in place the part of the law banning sex-altering
surgeries, which experts say are extremely rare for minors, and
other provisions prohibiting school officials from keeping certain
gender-identity information secret from parents.
(Reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |