| 
		Alabama cites Supreme Court abortion decision in transgender youth case
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [July 01, 2022] 
		By Steve Gorman 
 (Reuters) - Just days after the U.S. 
		Supreme Court abolished women's constitutional right to abortion, 
		Alabama has cited that ruling in a bid to outlaw parents from obtaining 
		puberty blockers and certain other medical treatment for their 
		transgender children.
 
 The citation came in an appeal by Alabama's attorney general seeking to 
		lift a federal court injunction that partially blocked enforcement of a 
		newly enacted state ban on medical interventions for youth whose gender 
		identity is at odds with their birth sex.
 
 The appeal is believed to mark the first time a state has expressly 
		invoked the recent Supreme Court opinion overturning its 1973 Roe v. 
		Wade decision legalizing abortion and applied the same reasoning to a 
		separate issue bearing on other rights.
 
 Echoing the high court's language in striking down Roe, the Alabama 
		appeal filed on Monday argued that the state has the authority to outlaw 
		puberty-blocking hormones and other therapies for transgender minors in 
		part because they are not "deeply rooted in our history or traditions."
 
 The appeal also asserted that such treatments are dangerous and 
		experimental, contrary to broad agreement among mainstream medical and 
		mental health professionals that such gender-affirming care saves lives 
		by reducing the risk of depression and suicide.
 
 
		
		 
		Last Friday's 5-4 decision from the Supreme Court's conservative 
		majority immediately paved the way for numerous states to enact measures 
		erasing or restricting a woman's ability to terminate her own pregnancy.
 
 But civil liberties advocates have also worried that the latest abortion 
		ruling, in a Mississippi case titled Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health 
		Organization, would invite attempts by Republican-controlled 
		legislatures to take aim at other rights that conservatives oppose.
 
 Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said 
		nothing in the Dobbs decision should "cast doubt on precedents that do 
		not concern abortion."
 
 However, Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, urged the 
		court to reconsider past rulings protecting the right to contraception, 
		legalizing gay marriage nationwide and invalidating state laws banning 
		gay sex.
 
		
		 
		[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			A view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., March 
			4, 2022. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo 
            
			
			
			 CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION
 The Alabama appeal seeking to restore its law barring parents for 
			providing gender-transitioning medical care to their children 
			appeared intended to draw just such a review, according to LGBTQ 
			rights proponents.
 
 "This is the first case, to our knowledge, in which a state has 
			invoked Dobbs to attack another fundamental right," Shannon Minter, 
			legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said in an 
			email to Reuters on Thursday.
 Still, Minter said Alabama's strategy was "unlikely 
			to gain much traction because the majority opinion was so clear that 
			its holding was restricted to the right to abortion."
 Alito sought to distinguish abortion from other established rights 
			because of its implication for terminating what the Roe ruling 
			termed "potential life." But many legal scholars have noted that 
			Dobbs calls into question the constitutional foundation for other 
			rights later recognized by the court.
 
 The Alabama law, passed by a Republican-dominated legislature, was 
			blocked from enforcement in May, less than a week after it went into 
			effect, in a preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge 
			Liles Burke, an appointee of former Republican President Donald 
			Trump.
 
 Burke held that higher court rulings made clear that parents have a 
			right to direct the medical care of their children if it meets 
			acceptable standards and that transgender people are protected 
			against discrimination under federal law.
 
 
			
			 
			Burke left in place the part of the law banning sex-altering 
			surgeries, which experts say are extremely rare for minors, and 
			other provisions prohibiting school officials from keeping certain 
			gender-identity information secret from parents.
 
 (Reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Robert Birsel)
 
			[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]  This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |