U.S. Supreme Court nixes religious challenge to New York vaccine mandate
Send a link to a friend
[July 01, 2022]
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme
Court on Thursday declined to hear a challenge to New York's mandate
that healthcare sector workers be vaccinated against COVID-19 brought by
a group of doctors, nurses and others who objected on religious grounds.
Turning away an appeal by 16 healthcare workers, the justices left in
place a lower court ruling that rejected their claim that the mandate
violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment prohibition against
religious discrimination by the government. Most of the workers either
resigned from their jobs, lost hospital admitting privileges or were
fired for refusing the vaccine.
Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch,
dissented from the decision to deny the appeal.
The Supreme Court previously rejected other challenges to vaccine
mandates including one focusing upon Maine's lack of a religious
exemption for healthcare workers.
New York's Department of Health last Aug. 26 ordered healthcare
professionals who come in contact with patients or other employees to be
vaccinated against COVID-19 as a safety measure during a pandemic that
has killed more than a million Americans.
The state allows a narrow medical exemption for the small number of
people with a serious allergic reaction to the COVID-19 vaccines.
The state has said that under the policy employers can consider
religious accommodation requests and employees can be reassigned to jobs
such as remote work. Healthcare workers in the state have also been
subject to similar vaccine mandates measles and rubella, which also have
no religious exemptions.
[to top of second column]
|
A bin of discarded syringes used to administer COVID-19 vaccines is
pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S.,
December 17, 2021. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri
The dispute began when a group of
doctors, nurses, therapists and other healthcare workers - mostly
Catholics - sued in federal court under pseudonyms. Among the
plaintiffs, three doctors lost admitting privileges, seven providers
were fired or resigned, five chose to be vaccinated "under protest"
and one eventually received a medical exemption.
Overall, nearly 37,000 New York healthcare workers either resigned,
retired or were fired or furloughed for being unvaccinated,
according to state data.
The plaintiffs have said they object to any
COVID-19 vaccine whose testing or development relied on cell lines
from aborted fetuses.
The COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States do not contain
aborted fetal cells. Laboratory-grown cells that descended from the
cells of an aborted fetus obtained decades ago were used in testing
during the vaccine development process. The Vatican issued guidance
to Catholics in 2020 that it is morally acceptable to use COVID-19
vaccines.
New York noted in a legal filing that use of such cell lines for
testing is common, including for the rubella vaccination, which
healthcare workers already take.
The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a bid
by the plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction, finding last
November that the mandate neutrally applied to everyone and likely
was not biased against religion.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|