Kansas to vote on abortion rights in first statewide test after Roe's
demise
Send a link to a friend
[July 19, 2022]
By Gabriella Borter
WICHITA, Kan. (Reuters) - A fight over
abortion access in Middle America is roiling the hills and plains of
Kansas, where voters will decide whether the state's constitution should
go on protecting the right to terminate a pregnancy.
The Aug. 2 vote is the first statewide electoral test of abortion rights
since June 24 when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the
landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.
The divisive issue has animated political campaigns nationally ahead of
a congressional election on Nov. 8.
Interested groups on both sides have contributed big money. Both have
been knocking on doors in Wichita and in the Kansas suburbs of Kansas
City, Missouri, in a race to win over voters with moderate views on
abortion.
Kansas Republicans had been pushing for a state constitutional amendment
to scrap abortion rights since 2019, when the Kansas Supreme Court ruled
the constitution protected the right to abortion.
Kansas allows abortion up to 22 weeks in pregnancy with several
additional restrictions, including a mandatory 24-hour waiting period
and mandatory parental consent for minors.
It has more lenient abortion policies than some neighboring red states,
although it is a deeply conservative state that Republican Donald Trump
won with 56% of the vote in 2016 and 2020.
The proposition would amend the Kansas bill of rights to say there is no
state constitutional right to abortion, and enable the Republican-led
legislature to regulate it much further.
That could roll back abortion access across the U.S. heartland. Patients
travel to Kansas from Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri, which all
effectively banned the procedure after Roe was overturned.
Other states, including Kentucky, Vermont, California and likely
Michigan, will ask voters to weigh in on abortion rights in ballot
initiatives this year.
YOUNG VOTERS COUNT
Wichita State University political science professor Neal Allen expects
the amendment to pass, but the 29% of registered voters unaffiliated
with a political party, including many young people, could prove
critical to opponents' chances.
"I think this amendment will win or lose based upon the level of turnout
of younger Kansans who don't necessarily like the Democratic Party but
want to defend abortion rights," Allen said.
A statewide survey released in February by the Docking Institute of
Public Affairs at Fort Hays State University found that 50.5% of
residents agreed "the Kansas government should not place any regulations
on the circumstances under which women can get abortions."
Sixty percent disagreed that abortion should be completely illegal.
Supporters of the amendment call it the "Value Them Both" amendment. The
proposal states, "Kansans value both women and children."
Gabby Lara, a canvasser with the Value Them Both campaign, was careful
to tell voters in a Kansas City suburb that the amendment was not the
same as a total abortion ban.
A recent college graduate, Lara had a fresh forearm tattoo of a rose and
"2022" in Roman numerals to commemorate the fall of Roe v. Wade.
The campaign's message about "common sense limits" resonated with Amanda
Hopson, a 37-year-old mother of two boys.
[to top of second column]
|
Lillian, 12, hands out pamphlets to urge residents to vote "no" on a
proposed amendment to Kansas constitution that would assert there is
no right to abortion, in Wichita, Kansas, U.S., July 10, 2022.
REUTERS/Gabriella Borter
Citing her Catholic values, Hopson said she had
refused to terminate her first pregnancy after she got in a car
accident and her water broke at 13 weeks. Her son, born at 26 weeks,
is almost 3 and breathes through a tracheostomy tube.
"It’s not a choice I would make," she said of abortion while voicing
some openness to rare exceptions in cases of rape and incest. "I do
understand that there are certain circumstances where things are
necessary."
'NO TO MORE GOVERNMENT CONTROL'
Kansans for Constitutional Freedom, the main coalition opposing the
amendment, has sought to appeal to some conservative voters'
preference for smaller government, emphasizing that a vote "yes"
would strip voters of a right and give more power to lawmakers to
regulate abortion.
"Kansans don't want another government mandate. Say no to more
government control," one of the coalition's ads says.
The Catholic Church - including the diocese of Wichita and the
archdioceses of Kansas City and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - was the
top supporter of the Value Them Both campaign in 2021, contributing
approximately $760,000, according to the most recent campaign
finance reports filed in February.
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood, including the local affiliates and
national organizations, were the biggest contributors to Kansans For
Constitutional Freedom, giving $235,000 and $110,000, respectively.
Should the amendment pass, abortion rights would likely figure
prominently in the state's legislative and gubernatorial elections
in November.
Governor Laura Kelly, a member of President Joe Biden's Democratic
Party who is considered vulnerable as she seeks re-election, opposes
the amendment.
"She'll continue to oppose all regressive legislation that
interferes with individual freedoms or threatens the strides we've
made in recent years," a spokesperson for Kelly said in a statement.
Kelly's likely Republican opponent, State Attorney General Derek
Schmidt, has praised the amendment and said he will vote for it.
As they canvassed a Wichita neighborhood on a sweltering summer day,
amendment opponents Katie Grover, 44, and her daughter Lillian, 12,
urged voters to consider the ramifications of stripping abortion
rights from the state constitution.
"A 'yes' vote means we put all the power in the legislature," said
Grover, who wore a T-shirt that said "Mother by choice, for choice."
Angelica Aryee, a 37-year-old pregnant mother of two, said she
believes abortion is immoral. But an independent, Aryee said having
one daughter and another on the way made her second-guess whether
she wants lawmakers to be able to prevent her children from getting
abortions.
After talking to Grover, Aryee said she would vote "no" on the
amendment.
"I’m afraid the more power we give them, the more they’re going to
take from us," Aryee said.
(Reporting by Gabriella Borter; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and
Howard Goller)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |