Prosecutors set to urge conviction of Trump ex-adviser Bannon
Send a link to a friend
[July 22, 2022]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal prosecutors
are due to make their final pitch to jurors on Friday to convict Steve
Bannon, Donald Trump's former presidential adviser, on charges of
contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena by the committee
investigating last year's attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The prosecution and defense are expected to deliver closing arguments to
the 12-member jury in federal court, with deliberations expected to
begin afterward. The defense rested its case on Thursday without calling
any witnesses after the prosecution rested on Wednesday, having called
two witnesses over two days.
Bannon, 68, has pleaded not guilty to two misdemeanor counts after
rebuffing the House of Representative select committee's subpoena
requesting testimony and documents as part of its inquiry into the Jan.
6, 2021, rampage by Trump supporters trying to overturn his 2020
election defeat.
Prosecutors said they expect their arguments to last about 30 minutes,
plus 15 for rebuttal. The defense said it plans to take roughly the same
amount of time to make its arguments.
The defense made motions to U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols asking him
to acquit Bannon, arguing the prosecution failed to prove its case, or
dismiss the charges because his lawyers were blocked from calling as
witnesses lawmakers who are members of the committee. Such motions
seeking acquittals and dismissals at the end of a trial are common and
rarely granted.
David Schoen, one of Bannon's attorneys, told Nichols that Bannon had
wanted to testify at the trial, but opted not to do so due to the limits
the judge placed on the kinds of arguments the defendant could make.
Bannon was barred from arguing that he believed his communications with
Trump were subject to a legal doctrine called executive privilege that
can keep certain presidential communications confidential. The judge
also prohibited Bannon from arguing that he relied on legal advice from
an attorney in refusing to comply.
Bannon's primary defense in the trial was that he believed the
subpoena's deadline dates were flexible and subject to negotiation
between his attorney and the committee.
[to top of second column]
|
Steve Bannon, talk show host and former White House adviser to
former President Donald Trump, arrives to U.S. District Court in
Washington, U.S., June 15, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo
Schoen told Nichols on Thursday he felt Bannon's
lawyers had been "badly stymied in being able to present a defense"
due to some of the judge's pretrial rulings limiting the scope of
their arguments. Nichols replied that some of his rulings were bound
by legal precedent "that I don't even think is right."
The main prosecution witness was Kristin Amerling, a senior
committee staff member. She testified on Wednesday that Bannon
disregarded the subpoena's two deadlines, sought no extensions and
offered an invalid rationale for his defiance - a claim by Trump
involving a legal doctrine called executive privilege that can keep
certain presidential communications confidential.
Trump's supporters stormed the Capitol and attacked police in a
failed effort to block formal congressional certification of his
2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, which Trump falsely claims
was the result of widespread voting fraud. Bannon was a key adviser
to Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, then served in 2017 as his
chief White House strategist.
Bannon has spoken only once in court throughout the trial. He said,
"Yes, your honor," when Nichols asked if he agreed not to testify.
Outside the courthouse, Bannon has let loose in front of the TV
cameras. On Thursday, Bannon told reporters he probably has
testified in various cases "more than anybody else in the Trump
administration" and that in those instances lawyers negotiated and
they worked it out "every time."
"One last thing. I stand with Trump and the Constitution," Bannon
added.
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Additional reporting by Eric Beech;
Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|