"The kind of guidance we've seen in the past ... creates an
expectation that's unrealistic," Dennis Lockhart, former
president of the Atlanta Federal Reserve, told the Reuters
Global Markets Forum (GMF) on Thursday.
"I think it's better to embrace the uncertainty and understand
that (the Fed) is navigating and figuring it out as they go
along," he said.
Jeremy Stein, a former member of the Fed's Board of Governors,
told GMF that overly specific guidance limits the central bank's
flexibility at a time when the trajectory of inflation and
economic growth remains uncertain.
"The big question is how far are we going to have to (hike
interest rates) in a year? We don't really know. Giving the
market a false sense of certainty doesn't really help," said
Stein, currently a professor at Harvard University.
After the Fed raised interest rates by 75 basis points on
Wednesday, Chair Jerome Powell avoided signaling the size of
subsequent rate hikes. Other central banks have similarly
emphasised a meeting-by-meeting "data-driven" approach.
Market focus on the "next meeting" often risks missing the more
important angle of how high rates will head in the long-term,
and their impact on financial conditions, Stein said.
Lockhart believes that while the probability is low, a
100-basis-point rate hike is on the table at the Fed's September
meeting. Both he and Stein were sceptical about inflation waning
quickly.
Unemployment skyrocketed during the Great Financial Crisis in
2008 along with a fairly limited decline in price rises, Stein
said, adding that a replay of this scenario could test the Fed's
resolve to bring inflation back near their 2% target.
(Join GMF, a chat room hosted on Refinitiv Messenger: https://refini.tv/33uoFoQ
https://refini.tv/33uoFoQ))
(Reporting by Lisa Pauline Mattackal in Bengaluru; Additional
reporting by Nishara Pathikkal in Bengaluru; Editing by Divya
Chowdhury and Kim Coghill)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|