How a battery shortage is hampering the U.S. switch to wind, solar power
Send a link to a friend
[June 09, 2022]
By Nichola Groom
(Reuters) -U.S. renewable energy developers
have delayed or scrapped several big battery projects meant to store
electrical power on the grid in recent months, scuttling plans to
replace fossil fuels with wind and solar energy.
At least a dozen storage projects meant to support growing renewable
energy supplies have been postponed, canceled or renegotiated as labor
and transport bottlenecks, soaring minerals prices, and competition from
the electric vehicle industry crimp supply.
One previously unreported dispute over a delayed California storage
project has even wound up in court.
The slowdown in utility-scale battery installations threatens the pace
of the U.S. transition away from fossil fuels as the Biden
administration seeks to decarbonize the grid by 2035. The delays could
pose a threat to power reliability in states that already depend heavily
on renewable energy like California.
Storing power is considered vital to the expansion of solar and wind
energy because it allows electricity generated when the sun is shining
or wind is blowing to be used at the end of the day when consumers need
it most.
The delays span states including California, Hawaii and Georgia, with
battery providers including Tesla and Fluence warning of disruptions to
supply, according to a review of regulatory documents, corporate
statements and interviews with project developers and power providers.
The delays, some of which have not been previously reported, range from
several months to a year, according to the Reuters reporting.
"I have not seen a nascent industry challenged on so many fronts," said
Jamal Burki, president of IHI Terrasun Solutions, the U.S. energy
storage arm of Japanese heavy equipment maker IHI Corp.
European energy storage projects are also facing delays, but that region
lags the United States in the development of grid-scale storage, making
the issue less pronounced.
Ben Guest, fund manager at Gresham House Energy Storage Fund, which
invests in battery projects in Britain, said he has seen two- to
three-month delays in projects primarily due to component shortages and
shipping challenges.
Energy storage makes up about 3% of U.S. operating clean energy capacity
and has been growing rapidly. Installations soared 170% in the first
quarter to 758 megawatts, according to the American Clean Power
Association, roughly enough capacity to power 144,000 homes.
But the pace is dipping below forecasts. Energy research firm Wood
Mackenzie told Reuters it may revise down its current outlook for U.S.
storage installations of 5.9 GW this year because of the rising evidence
of market disruptions, after 2021 installations came in at about
two-thirds of what it initially expected.
Prices for lithium-ion batteries, three-quarters of which are produced
in China, have soared as much as 20% since last year as lithium and
nickel costs rise, COVID-19 lockdowns disrupt manufacturing, and
transport constraints slow shipments.
Robust demand from EV producers for batteries has also been a headwind,
industry players told Reuters. Battery manufacturers are favoring the EV
market because their orders are more predictable compared to the lumpy,
project-based orders from power storage developers.
"When the pullback happens, it's felt worse by the storage industry than
it is by the electric vehicle industry," said Andy Tang, vice president
of energy storage and optimization at storage developer Wartsila. "We're
a difficult customer."
Recent turmoil in the solar industry, caused by uncertainty over
potential tariffs on Asian imports, has also impacted storage
development. Constructing storage alongside solar allows facilities to
claim a federal tax credit that does not exist for standalone batteries.
The Biden administration this week announced it would waive tariffs for
two years on panels from countries impacted by a Commerce Department
investigation, an attempt to revitalize solar installations. SUMMER
CRUNCH
These obstacles have raised questions about the fate of some 14.7
gigawatts of U.S. battery storage in development, some of which state
authorities had hoped would be in place to prevent blackouts as early as
this summer.
[to top of second column]
|
Solar panels are seen next to a Southern California Edison
electricity station in Carson, California March 4, 2015.
REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo
Among recent delays is 535-MW of storage Ameresco Inc
is developing for Southern California Edison, one of the state's
biggest utilities. It expects just a portion of the project -- about
300 MW -- to be online by its August target.
Ameresco did not respond to a request for comment.
Central Coast Community Energy (CCCE), which
purchases power on behalf of 430,000 customers in five California
counties, is also facing delays of six clean energy projects,
including 122 MW of storage, needed to meet state-mandated clean
energy requirements, according to spokesperson Catherine Stedman.
The developers of the projects, originally meant to come online this
year and next, have warned of delays between six and 12 months,
Stedman said.
CCCE and Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority, its partner in
several projects, meanwhile, have sued developer EDF Renewables over
its termination of contracts for the Big Beau solar and storage
project that started generating power last year.
EDF in March had asked to increase the price for the project's still
unfinished energy storage component by $76.8 million -- a 233%
increase, according to the complaint filed May 9 in California state
court in Santa Clara County.
EDF did not respond to a request for comment.
The disruptions have concerned state officials, already dealing with
perennial power shortages during peak summer demand. Governor Gavin
Newsom said in April that the state had been counting on new battery
storage projects, many of which were procured following rolling
blackouts in August 2020, to shore up summer reliability.
"Delays in the online dates of these projects are a very real
concern," California Public Utilities Commission spokesperson Terrie
Prosper said in a statement. OPEN-ENDED PROBLEM
Energy research firm Rystad said that given the large appetite for
batteries from a surging EV market, global supplies for utility
storage projects are not expected to be able to meet demand in the
medium-term.
That's a problem, the International Energy Agency says. Battery
storage needs to reach 585 GW by 2030 to decarbonize the global
power sector, a 35-fold increase from 2020.
"If you can't get the batteries manufactured and reliably delivered
at a price point that is coming down... you're going to slow the
ability of batteries to accelerate the transition," said Jim Kapsis,
founder of climate technology advisory firm the Ad Hoc Group.
In Hawaii, utility Hawaiian Electric is seeing delays in solar and
storage projects it contracted to help replace the state's only
coal-fired power plant, set to retire in September. The developer of
four projects, Canada's Innergex Renewable Energy, revealed on a
conference call last month that it was seeking to renegotiate the
terms of the deals – including price and timing - after receiving
force majeure notices from its battery supplier, Tesla.
Hawaiian Electric spokesperson Sharon Higa said the utility expected
just 39 MW of the 378.5 MW of solar and storage it procured to be in
service prior to the AES coal plant retiring.
Innergex and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.
Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk acknowledged earlier this year in a
conference call that the company had prioritized EV battery supplies
over stationary storage.
Fluence, meanwhile, said in a conference call last month that it has
issued force majeure notices on three contracts because its battery
suppliers in China were not able to fulfill their obligations. It
said it had also raised prices on new contracts by 15% to 25% and
would price future contracts based on raw material indices to guard
against volatility.
(Reporting by Nichola Groom in Los Angeles; Additional reporting by
Susanna Twidale in London; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |