Judge rejects NRA bid to end New York probe into gun rights group
Send a link to a friend
[June 11, 2022]
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York judge on
Friday rejected the National Rifle Association's bid to end an
investigation by that state's attorney general into alleged corruption
at the gun rights group.
Justice Joel Cohen of the New York state court in Manhattan said the NRA
did not show that Attorney General Letitia James' probe was a
politically motivated effort to target the group and silence its speech
because she disliked its policies.
James, a Democrat, sued the NRA in August 2020, accusing it of diverting
millions of dollars to fund luxuries for officials like longtime Chief
Executive Wayne LaPierre, using no-show contracts for associates and
making other questionable expenses.
Cohen had on March 2 blocked James' effort to dissolve the NRA, but in
Friday's decision said she still had many legally viable claims against
the nonprofit.
"The narrative that the attorney general's investigation into these
undeniably serious matters was nothing more than a politically
motivated--and unconstitutional--witch hunt is simply not supported by
the record," he wrote.
William Brewer, a lawyer for the NRA, said the group was disappointed,
but the decision would not affect its defenses or its Second Amendment
advocacy.
"There is an extraordinary public record that
[James], as a candidate, vowed to target the association--chilling
evidence of her motivations toward a political adversary," he said.
[to top of second column]
|
Wayne LaPierre, CEO of the National Rifle Association (NRA), speaks
at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum during the National Rifle
Association (NRA) annual convention in Houston, Texas, U.S. May 27,
2022. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton
James, who is seeking re-election, in a statement said the decision
"reaffirmed the legitimacy and viability of my office's lawsuit
against the NRA for its years of fraud, abuse and greed."
In refusing to let James dissolve the NRA, Cohen found a lack of
evidence the group benefited from financial misconduct or could not
serve its members, the sort of "public harm" that could justify a
"corporate death penalty."
LaPierre has long faced allegations he exploited his three decades
leading the NRA for his personal benefit.
During a trial last year that ended the NRA's effort to file for
bankruptcy and reincorporate in Texas to avoid James' oversight,
LaPierre testified about gifts he received, including yacht trips
from a Hollywood producer, but denied wrongdoing.
The case is New York v. The National Rifle Association of America
Inc et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No.
451625/2020.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David
Gregorio)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |