UK condemns court decision to block Rwanda deportation, will not leave
convention
Send a link to a friend
[June 16, 2022]
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain has no plans to
leave the European Convention on Human Rights, but the Strasbourg court
which enforces it overstepped its powers in blocking the deportation of
asylum seekers to Rwanda, deputy prime minister Dominic Raab said on
Thursday.
The government was thwarted in its attempt to send a handful of migrants
on a charter plane more than 4,000 miles (6,4000 km) to Rwanda on
Tuesday after the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) stepped in to
issue injunctions, cancelling the flight.
Raab, who is also Britain's justice secretary, criticised the
Strasbourg-based court for essentially blocking the flight, part of a
policy which London says will stem the flow of migrants making dangerous
trips across the English Channel from France.
Raab said the flights would take place despite criticism from the United
Nations, the leadership of the Church of England and Prince Charles, the
heir to the throne, who has privately described the plan as "appalling"
according to media reports.
"Our plans involve staying within the Convention, the European
Convention. It is also important the Strasbourg court reflects and stays
faithful to its mandate as part of the convention," he told BBC
television.
[to top of second column]
|
British Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Justice
Dominic Raab arrives at 10 Downing Street, in London, Britain, June
7, 2022. REUTERS/Hannah Mckay
"The Strasbourg court itself has said for many years
that there's no binding power of injunction. And then later on they
said: 'Well actually, we can issue such binding injunctions.' It is
not grounded in the Convention," Raab told Sky News.
The European court's late intervention had led some in Prime
Minister Boris Johnson's Conservative Party to call for Britain to
pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights altogether.
Challenged over death threats on social media to human rights
lawyers, Raab said they were unacceptable but Britain's Human Rights
Act had led to an "industry" of lawyers promoting "elastic
interpretations" of the law on behalf of their clients.
He added that the government could not give a fixed date for when it
would be able to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.
(Reporting by Muvija M; writing by David Milliken; editing by
Elizabeth Piper)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |