In
a statement to be released on Thursday, the New York-based
Investor Alliance for Human Rights said companies must consider
ending Russian business deals if they cannot avoid contributing
to human rights harms.
However, divestment decisions "must be scrutinized for any
unintended human rights consequences" said the statement, issued
on behalf of more than 200 global members.
Alliance officials said Western companies should do a deep
analysis as they decide whether to stay or go, and take steps
like protecting workers from retaliation if they join
demonstrations against the invasion.
Some businesses like state-owned banks and energy firms might be
obvious partners to drop, said Rebecca DeWinter-Schmitt,
associate director for the alliance. But, she said, "It's
another thing if you're a company that's primarily producing
milk for the domestic market and you decide its too messy and
pull out, that could cut food supplies."
The statement shows the tensions facing many U.S. and European
corporations and investors as companies including Boeing, BP and
Norway's sovereign wealth fund end business relationships.
Western sanctions against Russia have increased since last week
including new export curbs announced on Wednesday.
Russia, which characterizes its action in Ukraine as a "special
operation," has responded by raising interest rates and limiting
asset sales by foreigners. Some western companies have noted
concerns for workers as they pull back.
In a statement announcing its exit from managing oil and gas
facilities on Sakhalin Island on Tuesday, for instance,
ExxonMobil said it would careful manage the process and that it
had "an obligation to ensure the safety of people, protection of
the environment and integrity of operations."
An Exxon spokesman declined further comment.
(Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|