U.S. judge rules against Kentucky clerk who denied same-sex marriage
licenses
Send a link to a friend
[March 21, 2022] (Reuters)
- A U.S. judge ruled that a former county
clerk from Kentucky knowingly violated the rights of same-sex couples by
denying them marriage licenses in 2015, clearing the way for a jury
trial seeking damages against her.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge David Bunning on Friday also denied
a request for immunity from former Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis.
Davis thrust herself into the center of the U.S. culture wars on the
issue of LGBTQ rights by denying the licenses in 2015, citing her
religious beliefs. She briefly went to jail for contempt of court over
her refusal and a deputy clerk in the eastern Kentucky county issued the
licenses.
The two couples in the lawsuit had sought to marry in the immediate
aftermath of the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision Obergefell v.
Hodges. They sued Davis in 2015, alleging she had violated their
constitutional rights.
In the Obergefell case, the highest court in the United States found
that, under the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, states must grant same-sex marriages
and recognize those of other states.
But Davis repeatedly refused to issue marriage licenses, despite a
letter from the governor instructing all county clerks to issue the
licenses and a legal opinion from the Rowan County attorney, which she
had sought, advising that she had a legal requirement to do so.
"It is readily apparent that Obergefell recognizes Plaintiffs'
Fourteenth Amendment right to marry. It is also readily apparent that
Davis made a conscious decision to violate Plaintiffs' right," the judge
ruled in a summary judgment.
[to top of second column]
|
Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis speaks during an interview on Fox
News Channel's 'The Kelly File' in New York September 23, 2015.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
With the essential facts in the case
now settled, the two couples, David Ermold and David Moore in one
case and James Yates and Will Smith in another, can proceed to jury
trial to seek damages against Davis as an individual.
Davis had previously been granted sovereign immunity in her official
capacity.
Liberty Counsel, a Christian organization representing Davis, said
it would continue to argue she is not liable for damages because she
is entitled to a religious accommodation granted by the state
legislature and former Governor Matt Bevin.
The group's statement also noted that conservative justices on the
U.S. Supreme Court could seek to revisit and overturn the Obergefell
decision.
"This case raises serious First Amendment free exercise of religion
claims and has a high potential of reaching the Supreme Court,"
Liberty Counsel founder and Chairman Mat Staver said in the
statement.
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|