Analysis-Ukraine crisis could derail drive to limit U.S. defense
spending
Send a link to a friend
[March 23, 2022]
By Patricia Zengerle and Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Many Democrats
thought their control of the White House and Congress would provide an
opportunity to rein in U.S. military spending, which had leaped 140%
since 2000, and to beef up social programs they felt had been neglected.
Then Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine, bringing intense pressure to
boost the Pentagon's budget significantly, and not just for the coming
year.
"The world did not cooperate," said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine.
Congress this month passed an increase in defense spending of nearly 6%,
a total expected to keep rising despite President Joe Biden's withdrawal
of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in August after 20 years of war. Kaine
said Russia and China were both concerns.
"The switch of the primary threat from non-state terrorist organizations
to nation-states - and two big ones - that's going to require
significant investment, and some retooling of investment," Kaine told
Reuters.
Defense cuts have always been a tough sell in Congress. Support for a
powerful military is a traditional area of bipartisan agreement, while
defense contractors exert strong influence as a leading-edge industry,
major employers and campaign donors.
In his first year in office, Biden submitted a budget keeping Department
of Defense spending basically flat. Congress backed an increase even
before Russian President Vladimir Putin's government invaded neighboring
Ukraine last month.
Representative Adam Smith, chairman of the House Armed Services
Committee, had hoped to tamp down what he saw as a bloated Pentagon
budget. But he said in a speech at the American Enterprise Institute
this month that had changed.
"The Russian invasion of Ukraine fundamentally altered what our national
security posture and what our defense posture needs to be. It made it
more complicated, and it made it more expensive," he said.
Analysts, lawmakers and congressional aides said higher spending would
likely continue even after the most urgent fears about Russian ambitions
wear off.
"Never waste a crisis," said Valerie Shen, director of the National
Security program at Third Way, a center-left think tank in Washington.
"Use it as an argument to get the policy position you always wanted
anyway," she said.
'PERMANENT INCREASE'
NATO allies like Germany have increased their military spending in the
past month. Washington is expected to keep spending more, to support any
ongoing Ukrainian resistance and back up allies most exposed to Russian
threats.
"I could see the United States increasing its presence in Europe. It
could be a permanent increase in defense posture" or temporary
deployments, said Todd Harrison, a defense budget analyst at the Center
for Strategic and International Studies.
[to top of second column]
|
Pedestrians walk by the United States Capitol building in
Washington, U.S. March 15, 2022. REUTERS/Emily Elconin/File Photo
Biden is expected to announce his
fiscal 2023 budget request on March 28.
Harrison speculated that Congress - which controls federal spending
- could add $20 billion to $30 billion to whatever the Democratic
president requests.
The 2023 total U.S. national defense budget will
top $800 billion, giving U.S. arms makers a revenue tailwind after
the COVID-19 pandemic choked supply chains for aerospace and
microchips and hampered sales.
Senator Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate
Appropriations Committee, said it was too early to know the overall
dollar amount Congress might settle upon for the military,
especially given the fluid situation in Ukraine.
"We should never turn our back on people fighting for freedom," he
told Reuters in a hallway interview.
The Dow Jones U.S. Defense Index, which tracks shares of defense
contractors, is up nearly 14% since Feb. 24, the day Russia invaded
Ukraine, an action Moscow calls a "special operation."
The largest U.S.-based defense contractors are Lockheed Martin,
Raytheon Technologies, Boeing Co, Northrup Grumman and General
Dynamics Corp..
For the last year, progressive Democrats had been pressuring party
leaders to push for more spending on non-defense priorities such as
battling climate change; helping lower-income families with
childcare; and expanding healthcare for the elderly.
Lawmakers who want to tamp down military spending increases said
they would not stop trying, although they were not optimistic.
Democratic Representative Jim McGovern, chairman of the powerful
House Rules Committee and a member of the Progressive Caucus, said
he supported Ukraine but not an endlessly expanding military budget.
"I would encourage us to take a more critical look at Pentagon
spending in general. I think that's separate and apart from what's
happening there (Ukraine)," he said as he left a speech to Congress
last week by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, whose appeal
for more help left some lawmakers in tears.
(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Richard Cowan; Editing by Mary
Milliken, Chris Sanders and David Gregorio)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |