Analysis-Hard landing: Lessors lose hope of getting Russian planes back
Send a link to a friend
[March 26, 2022] By
Jamie Freed
(Reuters) -As the clock runs down to
Monday's sanctions deadline for Russian airlines to hand back more than
400 leased planes worth almost $10 billion, foreign lessors are fast
losing hope that they will get their aircraft back.
Most of the planes are still flying Russian domestic routes, IBA
consultancy says, although Bermuda and Ireland - where most are
registered - have suspended airworthiness certificates which usually
means they should be grounded.
Aviation was an early business casualty of Moscow's invasion of Ukraine,
as the West and Russia imposed tit-for-tat airspace bans. Now, lessors
face big writedowns or a long insurance battle as the March 28 deadline
looms for terminating plane leases under European Union sanctions.
"I'm afraid that we are going to witness the largest sort of theft of
aircraft in the history of commercial civil aviation," said Volodymyr
Bilotkach, an associate professor of air transport management at
Singapore Institute of Technology.
Dual registration is not allowed under international rules, but Russia
has already moved more than half of the foreign-owned aircraft to its
own registry after passing a law permitting this, Russia's government
said on Wednesday.
The government also said 78 planes leased to Russian carriers had been
seized while abroad and would not fly back to Russia, Interfax news
agency said on Tuesday.
Major aircraft lessor Avolon has terminated all its Russian airline
leases and repossessed four of the 14 owned aircraft on lease with
Russian airlines outside the country, a source familiar with the matter
said on Friday.
It wasn't clear if the four planes were part of the 78 reported by
Moscow.
Although the planes are insured, the unprecedented nature and scale of
the potential losses will likely mean years of litigation between
lessors and insurers before any decisions on payouts are taken, analysts
say.
And even if the planes are repossessed, the recoverable value would be
in question because the aircraft must have accurate maintenance records
to ensure they have been fitted with genuine, traceable components -
another area targeted by Western sanctions on Russia.
Although the total value of the planes is huge, the impact on individual
leasing firms may still be manageable even if writedowns are required as
aircraft leased to Russian airlines account for less than 10% of most
leasing firm portfolios.
"It's not going to cripple these businesses," said Brad Dailey, a
director at Alton Aviation Consultancy who previously worked at
Ireland-based leasing giant AerCap Holdings.
[to top of second column] |
An Aeroflot Boeing 777-300ER aircraft is reflected in a puddle at
Sheremetyevo International Airport outside Moscow, Russia, July 7,
2015. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov
"What it does do in my view is it changes the future market potential of
Russia," he said.
COVERING LOSSES
Some private airlines have indicated their willingness to hand back planes to
the lessors, although it is unclear whether the Russian government will approve
the transactions.
Russia's UTair Airlines said on March 14 it would withdraw from service all nine
of its leased Boeing 737 NGs, citing owner requirements, a move that could
preserve longer-term relations after sanctions end.
Those planes have not flown since that announcement but remain in Russia, data
from flight tracking website FlightRadar24 show.
In some cases, lessors have security deposits that could be forfeit and could
help cover a portion of any losses - but still only a fraction of a plane's
value.
For example, a security deposit on narrowbody plane worth $20 million could be
about $450,000, the equivalent of three months rent, Alton's Dailey said.
Ratings agency KBRA said security deposits generally range from one to four
months of rent, depending on the credit assessment of the airline leasing the
plane.
Russian national carrier Aeroflot had been viewed as the best credit risk before
the invasion, industry sources said, although that assessment no longer applies
after Moscow's move to register its planes in Russia.
A person at a Chinese lessor with exposure to Aeroflot said no security deposits
had been taken from the airline and said insurance payouts appeared to be the
only route to cover losses.
The lessor plans to begin insurance claims after the March 28 deadline has
passed, said the person, who was not authorised to speak publicly about the
matter.
A source at another Chinese lessor with exposure to Aeroflot said that, instead
of taking a security deposit, it held U.S. dollar letters of credit from Russian
banks - but the source said they had no effective value now because of Russian
currency controls imposed in response to financial sanctions.
At lower-tier airlines, lessors are more likely to have stronger security
deposits in place, Dailey said.
(Reporting by Jamie Freed in Sydney; Additional reporting by Engen Tham in
Shanghai and Padraic Halpin in Dublin; Editing by Edmund Blair and Jan Harvey)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |