Leaked draft abortion ruling a major blow to Supreme Court, experts say
Send a link to a friend
[May 03, 2022]
By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) - The leak of a U.S. Supreme
Court draft opinion that would overturn the constitutional right to
abortion is a major breach of confidentiality that has heightened the
stakes in an already politically-charged case, experts say.
Politico on Monday night published a draft majority opinion that it had
obtained striking down the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which
guaranteed the right to abortion nationwide. It was a sign that the
court's 6-3 conservative majority was ready to flex its muscle.
While the substance of the draft sparked praise from anti-abortion
conservatives and Republicans and condemnation from abortion rights
advocates and Democrats, many court watchers blasted on the leak itself
as a rare if not unprecedented occurrence.
They predicted chaos inside the court and unpredictable consequences,
whose longstanding tradition of confidentiality and trust surrounding
its deliberations helps lend the institution its remove from the
political branches of government.
Unlike the White House and Congress, where leaks are a regular fact of
life and a tool of political operatives trying to advance their agendas,
the Supreme Court typically keeps its internal deliberations private.
"This is the equivalent of the Pentagon Papers leak, but at the Supreme
Court," Neal Katyal, a former acting U.S. Solicitor General, who argues
frequently before the court, said in a Twitter post. He was referring to
secret U.S. documents on the Vietnam War published by the New York Times
in 1971
The widely followed SCOTUSblog wrote on its Twitter account: "It's
impossible to overstate the earthquake this will cause inside the court,
in terms of the destruction of trust among the justices and staff."
'MASSIVE VIOLATION'
"Leaking a draft opinion is a massive violation of settled norms. It
just doesn't happen," tweeted Dan Epps, a professor of law at Washington
University in St. Louis, adding that the culprit likely "would be
someone who is upset" about what the court is doing.
Ilya Shapiro, a lecturer at the Georgetown University Law Center, posted
that the leaker is "someone on the left engaged in civil disobedience"
and called the leak "inexcusable and threatens the court's functioning."
[to top of second column]
|
Protestors react outside the U.S. Supreme Court to the leak of a
draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for
a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade
abortion rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May
2, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
While a number of commentators said the person who
leaked the draft is probably seeking to whip up public fervor to
change the justices' minds or get progressive voters to the polls
for the Nov. 8 congressional midterm elections, others disagreed,
asserting the leaker might be someone - a clerk or even a justice -
who sympathizes with the majority.
Such a person would be "worried (in a slightly crazy way) about
locking that majority down, and willing to take the extreme step of
leaking to advance that goal," said Joseph Fishkin, a professor at
the University of California Los Angeles.
This is not the first time an opinion has been leaked before its
intended release, according to Jonathan Peters, a law professor at
the University of Georgia School of Law. He said that the New York
Tribune reported the outcome in an 1852 case involving the Wheeling
and Belmont Bridge Company 10 days before the court issued the
decision.
Peters noted that other leaks have commented on decisions after
their release or on personal relationships and conflicts among the
justices.
In January National Public Radio reported that due to a surge in
COVID-19 infections the justices had been asked to wear masks but
only Neil Gorsuch refused, prompting a denial by the court.
Some observers said that the controversy, which is certain to
persist, could distract from the court's actions on the right to
abortion.
Law professor Rick Hasen said the development actually helps the
majority that overturns Roe v. Wade by deflecting commentary to
breach of court secrecy norms and by "lessening the blow by setting
expectations."
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Scott Malone and
Michael Perry)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|