Exclusive-Boeing clashes with key supplier ahead of Starliner spacecraft
launch
Send a link to a friend
[May 11, 2022] By
Joey Roulette
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Boeing Co is feuding
with Aerojet Rocketdyne, a key supplier for its Starliner spacecraft, as
the U.S. aerospace giant races to test launch the uncrewed astronaut
capsule and mend its reputation in the space sector, people familiar
with the matter said.
The CST-100 Starliner is scheduled for a May 19 Florida launch atop an
Atlas 5 rocket to the International Space Station, with Boeing aiming to
show NASA that the spacecraft is safe to ferry astronauts to and from
the orbiting outpost. Software failures cut short a similar 2019
uncrewed test flight.
The mission is a crucial step toward re-establishing Boeing as a viable
rival to billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's SpaceX, a drive
complicated by Boeing's disagreement with propulsion system supplier
Aerojet, according to three people who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Chicago-based Boeing and El Segundo, California-based Aerojet are at
odds over the cause of a problem involving fuel valves in the Starliner
propulsion system that forced a postponement of a test flight last July,
with the two companies faulting one another, the sources said.
The disagreement, which has not been reported before, comes at time when
Boeing already is scrambling to emerge from successive crises that have
hobbled its jetliner business and drained cash.
The Aerojet dispute is the latest illustration of Boeing's struggles
with Starliner, a program costing the company $595 million in charges
since 2019. Facing fixed-price NASA contracts that leave Boeing with
little wiggle room financially, the company has pressed forward with the
Starliner test.
Boeing in a statement provided by a spokesperson to Reuters acknowledged
for the first time that it ultimately intends to redesign Starliner's
valve system to prevent a repeat of the issue that forced last year's
test-flight postponement. The Boeing statement said that "we are working
on short- and long-term design changes to the valves."
Thirteen fuel valves that are part of a propulsion system that helps
steer Starliner in space were discovered stuck and unresponsive in the
closed position, prompting last year's postponement.
The various technical setbacks have pushed Starliner's first flight with
people aboard into an unknown future, placing it far behind Musk's
SpaceX, whose Crew Dragon capsule, developed under the same NASA program
as Starliner, has already flown five astronaut crews for the U.S. space
agency.
NASA hopes Boeing can provide additional options to carry astronauts to
the space station. NASA in March awarded SpaceX three more missions to
make up for Boeing's delays.
A team of Boeing and NASA engineers is in general agreement that the
cause of the stuck valves involves a chemical reaction between
propellant, aluminum materials and the intrusion of moisture from
Starliner's humid Florida launch site.
[to top of second column] |
An Atlas V rocket carrying Boeing's CST-100 Starliner capsule is
prepared for launch to the International Space Station for a do-over
test flight in Cape Canaveral, Florida, U.S. August 2, 2021.
REUTERS/Steve Nesius/File Photo
Aerojet engineers and lawyers see it differently, blaming a cleaning chemical
that Boeing has used in ground tests, two of the sources said.
An Aerojet representative declined to comment.
'ROOT CAUSE'
"Testing to determine root cause of the valve issue is complete," Boeing said in
its statement, and the work did not find the problems described by Aerojet.
NASA shares that view, Steve Stich, who oversees the Boeing and SpaceX crew
programs for the space agency, told Reuters.
Boeing also said Aerojet did not meet its contractual requirements to make the
propulsion system resilient enough to resist the problems caused by the chemical
reactions.
Boeing last week wheeled Starliner back to the launch pad for a third time ahead
of the upcoming launch, having swapped out the propulsion system for a new one
with a temporary fix that prevents moisture from seeping into the valve section.
Boeing and NASA said they did not recreate any fully stuck valves during nine
months of testing, instead measuring the degree to which valves struggled to
open.
This approach was used in order to get Starliner back to the launchpad quickly,
two of the sources said.
NASA, Boeing, Aerojet and independent safety advisers are set to meet this week
to reach a final determination on the cause of the valve problems and decide
whether the temporary fix will work.
Boeing officials privately regard Aerojet's explanation for the faulty valves as
a bid to deflect responsibility for the costly delay for Starliner and to avoid
paying for a redesigned valve system, two of the sources said.
"It's laughable," one person involved in the joint Boeing-NASA investigation of
the value issue said of Aerojet's claim, speaking anonymously to discuss
confidential supplier relations. "Getting a valve maker or propulsion system
provider to write down, 'Yeah, I screwed that up' ... that's never gonna
happen."
After testing and software issues caused Starliner's 2019 failure to dock at the
space station, NASA officials acknowledged they had trusted Boeing too much when
they decided to devote more engineering oversight to the newer SpaceX than the
aerospace giant.
The feud with Aerojet is not Boeing's first Starliner subcontractor quarrel. In
2017, Starliner had an accident during a ground test that forced the president
of a different subcontractor to have his leg medically amputated. The
subcontractor sued, and Boeing subsequently settled the case.
(Reporting by Joey Roulette; Editing by Will Dunham and Ben Klayman)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|