California law requiring women on company boards struck down
Send a link to a friend
[May 17, 2022] By
Jody Godoy
(Reuters) - A state court judge found
California's law requiring publicly held companies to include women on
their boards unconstitutional, dealing another blow to the state's push
to diversify corporate leadership.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued the decision
on Friday in favor of three California taxpayers who sought to block
enforcement of the law, according to a copy of the ruling.
Conservative legal group Judicial Watch represented the plaintiffs in
the case and another challenge that recently struck down a California
law mandating board diversity based on race and sexual orientation.
"The radical Left's unprecedented attacks on anti-discrimination law has
suffered another stinging defeat," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton
said in a statement.
A spokesperson for the California secretary of state said the office is
reviewing the judgment.
Three taxpayers challenged the law in 2019, saying it amounted to sex
discrimination in violation of the state's constitution.
California's secretary of state had defended the law at trial, arguing
that the state has a compelling interest in gender diversity on boards
and that the law was tailored to address a historic lack of women on
boards.
Duffy-Lewis ruled that the law violated the equal protection clause of
California's constitution. The secretary of state had failed to show the
law was narrowly tailored or that it was meant to remedy "specific,
purposeful, intentional and unlawful discrimination," she wrote.
Passed in 2018, the statute required publicly held companies based in
California to have up to three women directors, and allowed the
secretary of state to issue fines of up to $300,000 per violation. No
fines have been levied.
[to top of second column]
|
A view of the skyline of downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S.,
March 22, 2022. REUTERS/Mike Blake
The bill's author, former California state Senator
Hannah-Beth Jackson, said she believes the state will appeal the
verdict and prevail.
Judicial Watch recently won another taxpayer challenge to a similar
California law requiring boards to include directors who
self-identify as a member of an "underrepresented community," which
includes Asian, Black, Latino, Native American, and Pacific Islander
individuals, as well as those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or
transgender.
Jennifer Rubin, an attorney who counsels corporations on social and
governance issues, said that the secretary of state faces a high bar
in appealing the rulings.
"The prudent course of action is for the legislature to go back and
try to craft these laws in a way that is going to withstand
scrutiny," Rubin said.
Lawmakers could try an annual disclosure report similar to the one
instituted by stock exchange operator Nasdaq Inc, she said. The rule
requires listed companies to include diverse members on their boards
or explain why they have not.
(Reporting by Jody Godoy in Santa Ana, California; Editing by
Noeleen Walder, Jonathan Oatis and Aurora Ellis)
[© 2022 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|